There are two ways to win a Grand Slam: Condition A: Win 4 out of 10 consecutive Master events with one of the events being a designated event Condition B: Win 6 out of 10 consecutive Master events A designated event is just Katowice + Cologne + Potential ESL Major imgur.com/a/nvdLVjV Since thats the case, its pretty weird conditions, because I doubt anyone will ever win based on condition B since u need 6/10 instead of 4/10, and its also just weird that it has to be an ESL Major (I know it has to do with sponsorship but still) For example, you could win 3 Master events + ESL Major, and your team will have won a Grand Slam. But if u win 3 Master events + a PGL major you dont have a Grand Slam even though its not like winning an ESL major is more prestiguous than winning a BLAST or PGL major, it just makes it weird. Because a team with a Grand Slam + a major is seen as more accomplished than a team with just a major, even though they have literally won the same tier tournaments and its outside the teams control whether its a PGL major or ESL or BLAST major. Its something to be mindful of when blindly holding Grand Slams in high regard.