whats the point of this thread
molotovs back then were overpowered, they were silly
molotovs used to be broken, and players weren't used to it because there were no mollies in 1.6
only terrorists should be able to purchase them. govt forces using molly doesnt mske sense
Crazy to see how things are so different, then again I didn't play back then so I have no idea if they were really op or what not. But the game nowadays without Molotv's would be so wierd, all maps would get buffed on the T-side, with their no way to reasonably stop rushes, which in that post most of the players argue they want to be able to rush without risk. Also, this was all run by a 17 year old Gla1ve and MSL too, so wierd to think this.
We have just been to a small danish lan. (Anexis) us and Copenhagen Wovels agreed in not playing with molotovs, but the semi good teams "took" their chance and wanteded to play with them. And i can tell you one thing, if ESWC allows 5 molotovs per. team it will be a joke watching. You can plant the bomb on Upper nuke, make "sky molotovs" so its almost imposibel to defuse. Same thing as inferno. There is nothing to adapt to, molotovs are destryoing the game, and can be absued in so many ways... Set a limit 1-2 per team, otherwice remove em. If they dont do that to ESWC, it will be a big joke playing it for us, and a even bigger joke wathcing stream :)
Eblan Nahui Gustafson hehehe
TBF mollies were far better when they said that