by "that" - do you mean comparing numbers 144 and 240 or comparing stats from players?
It's hard to argue with people who think Hz is the only think that matters on a panel, there you can see an example of 144hz panel being a better panel with less overdrive that causes issues which resulted in some players doing better at 144hz.
Internet latency - 50ms
Total system latency - 30ms+
Difference between 240hz and 144hz - less than 1ms.
Time to render a frame at 300-ish FPS - 3ms
So good panel at 144hz is better than bad panel at 240hz. Clearly better because image is, well, more clear, and instead of seeing 8 enemies when you flick - you only see one. And for a budget 240hz - you are 100% getting a shit panel with pixels being overclocked to death and showing all sorts of shit.
There's far more to a monitor than just a Hz number, panels are complicated but I am probably wasting my time telling that to people who buy all the marketing BS.
And are blind to a point that they do not see the difference between good panels and bad panels.... for them it makes sense, they max out digital vibrance so good panel does not matter - image will look bad and there will be all sorts of artifacts around. But they will preach it's great to justify their purchase, despite experts in tech space agreeing that it's not that big of a deal.
Not to mention that for 240hz you are more likely to enable adaptive sync which adds 50% to total system latency (aka from the moment you click to the moment it shows on screen). Making it worse of a total outcome.
2022-11-22 10:56