Forum thread: Largest Armies in history

Just tell them you're gonna kill them if they don't go to the army

2022-12-19 03:53

britishers had a bigger army than mentioned i believe, they had people from their colonies fighting for them

2022-12-19 04:03

the ultimate rush b

2022-12-19 04:06

yeahh lets goo india 🔥🔥

2022-12-19 04:11

3 replies

rajahstan belongs to pakistan

2022-12-19 04:21

2 replies

for sure, a place called rajahstan probably belongs to pakistan

2022-12-19 04:23

1 reply

jk nice fight back against powerful sunni. Suni only converted 400 million indians and pagan Hindu 1 billion still 💪💪

2022-12-19 04:26

haha nice

2022-12-19 04:18

usa had 12 million at some point wonder if everyone even had guns or just something like sabers

2022-12-19 04:37

2 replies

usa had terrific logistics during ww2, was able to move and deploy forces efficiently than their allies and axis counterparts

2022-12-21 01:29

A lot of them weren't infantry. But all the infantry had guns in ww2. For sure.

2022-12-21 01:33

Brazil should cut that size at half... no bad neighbor, no enemies I dont even know what our armed forces are for, they don't do anything

2022-12-19 04:52

8 replies

They should tear up favelas

2022-12-19 04:59

4 replies

I think the UN and politicians would go crazy if it was their job Many people here believe that violence is not the way to solve the problem within the favelas, and it's kinda true, entering favelas and killing everyone who's armed is not going to solve the problems

2022-12-19 05:13

3 replies

Its easier than actually trying to get them to do something useful for society

2022-12-19 05:08

2 replies

I agree. What they need is a government to come in for 1 term, and take all the blame as they rid the favelas of the excrement. They won't get voted back in as everyone will feel sorry for the "poor" buggers that perished; but in the long term everyone wins and everyone can stay self-righteous.

2022-12-21 01:46

1 reply

Needs to happen, right thing for the country but not for themselves

2022-12-21 11:31

You might need them to defend from Portugal as they might reclaim their colonies in the future.

2022-12-19 05:02

2 replies

2022-12-21 00:16

average paradox games player thoughts

2022-12-21 01:32

one piece

2022-12-21 00:18

Turkey always in the top10

2022-12-21 00:26

2 replies

Neo ottoman empire by 2043

2022-12-21 00:26

turkey strong 💪💪💪

2022-12-21 01:32

USA goes brrrr in WW2

2022-12-21 01:17

You can kind of forgive the US for being paranoid the second half of the twentieth century. Look how big those red lines were compared to the west.

2022-12-21 01:33

USA and USSR had 11-12 million at the end of WW2 while USA was focused on two theatres USSR Had only one focus

2022-12-21 01:36

4 replies

Not entirely true, they had at the start of the war the winter war in Finland and the last few months against the Japanese. Also you must take into consideration that the Eastern front was over 20 times larger than the Western Front.

2022-12-21 01:57

3 replies

They had the same amount at the end of WW2 (11-12mln) for a fact that both were rivals and yes everybody knows that Eastern front was larger than west.

2022-12-21 01:59

2 replies

You'd be surprised at how few in the West know the size of the battles fought on the Eastern front. Due to films and education many get the impression that the main brunt of WW2 was fought on the shores of France.

2022-12-21 02:05

1 reply

yeah but at the same time the ww2 could ve been played out differently. But now we know the mistakes we did and see past them.

2022-12-21 02:08

Americans were a lot easier to transport back then, 11 million Americans back then is about 2 million Americans in todays mass.

2022-12-21 01:36

10 replies

nah in WW2 USA endebted themselves like no one else xD and then they profited of recovering countries

2022-12-21 01:38

9 replies

Well no they made most of their money during the war by extorting gold from countries involved in the war, and then also benefitted from not having been destroyed by the war and by nuking japan that was undermining the US's economy by doing basically what China does today. Capitalism at it's truest really but still better than the alternative which is just, I take stuff, you face wall as Dimitri puts seven rounds from his ppsh into your skull.

2022-12-21 01:40

2 replies

Nah there wasn't so much gold and Nazi's literally have hidden their gold in some weird ways either in personal secret places or switzer banks. Japanese didn't have so much gold even in the Asian theatre

2022-12-21 01:42

1 reply

There was in the UK... lol but that was further decimated again when we foolishly let labour control our government in the most recent times when we got into yet another war, this time started by the US against an innocent country.

2022-12-21 01:42

Said countries didn't have to take the money and material. Should we have given it for free? Not sure what people expect when they say things like this.

2022-12-21 01:43

5 replies

I'm not blaming US here bruh. I just have stated a quite known fact that US had used their power to expand it and build it further.

2022-12-21 01:45

4 replies

It's not exactly using their power to expand. They lent out bullets and trucks and airplanes. The brits just got done paying in 2020. No one would have done it for free though. The US could have just left the allies to their fates and traded with whomever was left.

2022-12-21 01:49

3 replies

I do know about that lend lease and everyone knows that was needed i was mostly talking about post-war recovery though.

2022-12-21 01:52

2 replies

True. They were also the only large power left where everything wasn't destroyed. I would say though in hindsight that the rebuilding of Germany and Japan was extremely beneficial to both countries. Really they got off better then a lot of the winners.

2022-12-21 01:58

1 reply

Yes and the Dollar as a currency soured to the skies. After the Second World War it was absolutely honor to literally work in USA at that time.

2022-12-21 02:02

surely after a certain point bigger number becomes a disadvantage

2022-12-21 01:50

1 reply

if you do get 30-50mln sure

2022-12-21 01:53

I'm still wondering why Soviet Union didn't decrease its army to get money & people for "Perestroika" Maybe it was the reason why Perestroika failed

2022-12-21 02:00

1 reply

The reason perestroika failed wasn't because of the army but because it was started too late. However the reason why army was still standing is because rebelious SSRS

2022-12-21 02:06

chinese history be like "Emperor Wu Liang Xo seized the throne 30 million people died"

2022-12-21 02:00

1 reply

Emperor of the people Mao took the throne 70-80mln people died

2022-12-21 02:07

Russia been fighting people nonstop for like 500 years they gotta relax man

2022-12-21 02:12