Nah I think achievements is an awful way to rank igls personally
give 2018/19 gla1ve the fnatic or nip roster and he is known as a failure.
Give him astralis and hes known as the best IGL of all time.
And im not trying to take anything away from him he invented so many strats that every team STILL uses today. But he wouldnt of won trophies with a worse team.
The way I rate IGLs is based on how much impact they had to the game,
happy, fallen, art, gla1ve, all changed the way the game was played. (ik art looks out of place but every team copies furias strats on new maps)
overall I still think comparing IGLs is a dumb idea, and the issue with how I rate IGLs is it only works with like 5-10 and there have been so many greats that I left out such as zeus because he never changed the meta