these cases are highly volatile, even though you used 100 cases the difference here is likely not significant enough to say for certain
2023-05-04 23:55
bruh everything is rigged in this shady mafia gambling buisiness... no brain cells needed to know that
2023-05-04 23:57
why did you lost all your time to make all of those calculs when you just had to check how provably fair works and understand that it dosn't change anything?
2023-05-05 00:06
Sample size is too small
Go do it for 10 tries of each
2023-05-05 00:07
Interesting might try it out
2023-05-05 03:25
Small sample size, you need to do this 100 more times for definite results
2023-05-05 03:36
you'd need a much higher sample for real results
2023-05-05 05:18
LOL KEEP LOOKING FOR CAUSAL RELATIONS IN ITERATIVE SYSTEMS YOU FUCKING IDIOT
2023-05-05 05:19
why would you use these sites in the first place? i have skinport to cash in money, i don't want to lose? ))
2023-05-05 14:13
good investigation. you should do the same but with 10k cases maybe more
2023-05-05 18:51
Nice way of spending your time
2023-05-05 23:58
RTP is based around 1million cases not 100.
2023-05-06 00:44
not big enough sample size. spend atleast 10k per code to get better data.
2023-05-06 00:47
U need more sample size to get relevant data, 2 accounts with one of each is not good enough
2023-05-06 00:59
There's probably just a big variance
2023-05-06 01:00
The sample isn't big enough to make such conclusion
2023-05-06 04:48
are there any big wins that you got like a skin that is 10 or 20x the price of the case?
2023-05-06 09:30
Unless there is a proof by checking the code, its just another day loosing money
2023-05-06 09:31
What's the point of giving better odds for ones who use streamer's code?..
2023-05-09 11:06
you realize you're betting on RNG seeds/tickets and the items you "win" from the cases are meaningless, right?
2023-05-09 11:09
You can't run two tests and determine whether something is true just based on the results. You'll need to take hundreds of samples to determine whether the difference is significant. In other words it could just be you happened to get luckier with JR's code, but it was just random.
2023-05-11 22:23
You dropped your tin foil hat
2023-05-14 00:43
someone explain to me in fnatic vs monte vertigo at the end game Boros got 31 kills but the result on hltv was 32.thanks!
2023-05-15 08:31
working on trying this out with 1000 cases
2023-05-23 05:23
To understand - you need to answer the question - why is this site?
I think it's just a coincidence. the sample is very small, you could get any result.
2023-05-23 06:51
I used jasonr and lost house
Please report this thread!!!
2023-05-25 03:35
98.7% of gamblers quit before they win big bois
2023-05-25 03:53
The fact that csgo tournaments are often held in Malta should give you a clue to how rigged this thing is. Just bet little bits and enjoy what you can afford to lose.
2023-06-05 12:12
Doable in the past, impossible nowadays, fkin Heroic ruined my money lol
2023-06-06 01:41
100 cases is not enough to draw any reasonable conclusions.
Law of the market states that on average you will be at a loss.
2023-06-07 12:01
Could be a lure or a leak. If it's a lure it's designed for you to lose in the long run anyway. If it's a leak it will be fixed soon and the site may even refuse to pay you, since you've used an exploit (read T&C of the site you're using, thing like that often mentioned). 99% it's the first option and 99% the system you described actually takes place
2023-06-07 15:22
is 100 enough of a sample size?
2023-06-12 08:56
It is known that betting is rigged
2023-06-23 14:11
try at least 3 times using that code
2023-06-26 05:44
you need a bigger sample size, the rng does not work like that;D
2023-06-26 05:58
Your sample size makes everything you said irrelevant
2023-06-30 05:25