Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Cs betting theory
Europe kikkimikipi 
So my friend told me that cs gambling sites actually change your winning odds based on whos code you use to deposit. He said he noticed a significantly better result when using a streamer/content creators code rather than a random one. I decided to put that to the test and analyze the odds. For this experiment i first used my friends code on cs roll on a fresh account and opened up 100 profit paradise cases that cost 1.72 each and here are the expected results: Cost per case: 1.72 Cost to open 100 cases: 172 Expected return per case (9% House Edge) : 1.56 Expected return per 100 cases: 156 Actual results using my friends code: Cost of 100 cases: 172 Return from 100 cases: 141,21 My return to player: 82% Then i went on cs roll again but with another fresh account and used streamer JasonR code to deposit and here are the results: Cost of 100 cases: 172 Return from 100 cases: 246.40 My return to player: 143.26% With my testing i can conclude that i had way better luck using jasonr code than my friends code. What do you guys think was i just lucky or could this be the case?
2023-05-04 23:53
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
keep gambling
2023-05-04 23:54
22 replies
i think im addicted already
2023-05-05 03:33
4 replies
#117
 | 
Brazil zhx0
o/
2023-05-25 00:55
3 replies
o/
2023-05-25 03:33
2 replies
#124
 | 
African Union eyoeyoklk
o/
2023-05-29 03:00
1 reply
o/
2023-05-30 02:01
#66
 | 
Japan papa_smurf
2023-05-09 11:14
16 replies
2023-05-09 15:01
15 replies
what is this
2023-05-09 16:06
14 replies
#86
 | 
Croatia Pagan44
2023-05-10 02:48
13 replies
bro?
2023-05-10 05:22
12 replies
#90
 | 
Croatia Pagan44
Sorry bro I had to xD
2023-05-10 12:04
11 replies
all good but still what is that
2023-05-10 13:04
10 replies
2023-05-10 13:08
9 replies
bro..
2023-05-10 19:43
8 replies
2023-05-12 14:47
7 replies
snax?
2023-05-13 15:40
6 replies
2023-06-06 01:44
5 replies
looks like scuffed tweeday
2023-06-07 11:00
4 replies
reVicer taking a nap
2023-06-07 11:54
1 reply
perkele
2023-06-08 11:05
haha
2023-06-11 01:09
1 reply
hahah
2023-06-30 05:16
#2
 | 
United Kingdom OGtop1
these cases are highly volatile, even though you used 100 cases the difference here is likely not significant enough to say for certain
2023-05-04 23:55
15 replies
should i try another case?
2023-05-05 00:03
13 replies
#6
 | 
United Kingdom OGtop1
try at least 10000 with each code to be sure
2023-05-05 00:04
3 replies
haha true but not worth it
2023-05-05 00:23
thats gonna take so long to do bro
2023-05-05 00:36
#28
RpK | 
France HippzZ
+1 too much variance with only 100 cases
2023-05-05 18:57
#11
 | 
Portugal SilousPT
Yeah like #6 said, you need a bigger amount of cases, maybe not 10k, I think 1k should be enough for low value and low volatility cases. 100 is just not enough
2023-05-05 00:26
3 replies
with 1k i can make a better conclusion?
2023-05-14 18:01
2 replies
#106
 | 
Portugal SilousPT
yes, but for low volatility cases, not like 0.5% knife cases, those you need alot more then 1k xD
2023-05-14 19:18
1 reply
so like the exact cases i already used
2023-05-15 00:29
#54
 | 
Brazil hbobbio
Go to dskjal, make an Excel with odds and see the Law of large numbers applied to gambling. Easy data for 0 dollar
2023-05-07 08:52
4 replies
huh
2023-05-08 23:46
bro this only works if the city isnt rigging the odds based on the code used
2023-05-08 23:49
2 replies
#57
 | 
Brazil hbobbio
good point
2023-05-09 05:14
thats what im saying
2023-05-09 15:28
172 observations with mean 82 vs 172 observations with mean 143 We technically need st. dev to run the t test, but I am 95% certain it will turn out statistically significant.
2023-06-05 12:08
bruh everything is rigged in this shady mafia gambling buisiness... no brain cells needed to know that
2023-05-04 23:57
1 reply
true
2023-05-05 00:32
house always wins
2023-05-04 23:58
2 replies
not this time
2023-05-05 00:17
1 reply
kkkkkkkk
2023-05-06 08:18
#7
 | 
France iZ_
why did you lost all your time to make all of those calculs when you just had to check how provably fair works and understand that it dosn't change anything?
2023-05-05 00:06
3 replies
#59
 | 
Bulgaria K1r1to
so the all sites are legit? xd
2023-05-09 05:49
2 replies
#78
 | 
France iZ_
all that uses provably fair yes.
2023-05-09 18:33
does it make sense to risk your free money printer's reputation by cheating the people who run it i.e. the gamblers?
2023-06-26 05:50
Sample size is too small Go do it for 10 tries of each
2023-05-05 00:07
4 replies
+1
2023-05-05 00:26
wouldnt 10 cases be less
2023-05-05 01:13
2 replies
I think he means 10 accounts
2023-05-05 15:34
1 reply
ye ima just pull out my 10 steam accounts
2023-05-10 00:26
Interesting might try it out
2023-05-05 03:25
3 replies
let me know how it goes
2023-05-06 09:28
2 replies
Up 850 rn
2023-05-06 22:25
1 reply
good for you
2023-05-09 16:09
Small sample size, you need to do this 100 more times for definite results
2023-05-05 03:36
1 reply
100 more times would take a lot of time and money lmao
2023-05-05 05:16
#20
 | 
United States WumboCumbo
you'd need a much higher sample for real results
2023-05-05 05:18
2 replies
100 cases is a lot tho
2023-05-05 05:23
1 reply
not even close to enough statistically, u got lucky this time so stop rn or u definitely gonna lose if u keep "testing"
2023-05-06 00:47
LOL KEEP LOOKING FOR CAUSAL RELATIONS IN ITERATIVE SYSTEMS YOU FUCKING IDIOT
2023-05-05 05:19
5 replies
Its not casual i did the analyzis bro
2023-05-05 14:07
4 replies
... are you a troll or just that stupid? It's causal, not casual. fucking learn how to read my guy
2023-05-05 18:45
3 replies
chill out no need to flame me i just misread it my bad lol
2023-05-05 19:17
2 replies
listen, you're a sitting there trying to figure out if rolling a die impacts the next die roll and so on. it is an exercise in navel gazing. I'm the only friend you've ever had. don't bet, you aren't a shark. save your money.
2023-05-05 19:38
1 reply
#41
 | 
China RADNIKEY
Holly molly!
2023-05-06 01:01
why would you use these sites in the first place? i have skinport to cash in money, i don't want to lose? ))
2023-05-05 14:13
9 replies
its fun :)
2023-05-05 23:54
Is skinport really safe and trusted?
2023-05-09 05:45
7 replies
Read Customer Service Reviews of skinport.com Trustpilot trustpilot.com › ... › Online Marketplace The first marketplace with convenient item-and-sticker keyword search. A gorgeous, rapidly rendered and smooth user interface genuinely in a league of its own. Rating: 4,9 · ‎16,534 reviews 4.9/5 stars and 16k reviews - so definitely is the safest one. i'm using it on a daily basis.
2023-05-09 10:48
5 replies
skinport selling fees are way too high, sell on csgofloat or buff or something p2p
2023-05-09 11:11
3 replies
oh yeah, sell on csgoscam instead of the safest site for 2 percent extra. good advice, got more? also i had listed on csgofloat items for months with ZERO sales, and on skinport sold them quite fast. i think it matters in the end if you're actually selling those items in the end? lol
2023-05-09 11:23
2 replies
imagine being such a brainlet that you think peer2peer trading is a scam (aka you yourself sending the item to the buyer while the funds are already in escrow) + no trade cooldown
2023-05-09 11:20
1 reply
bro imagine making good/very good amount of money on skinport > 0 (ZERO) on csgofloat. yes, i'm crying right now media.tenor.com/dYLvyNRhV8sAAAAC/woody-h..
2023-05-09 11:30
Thanks a lot! Will definitely try it out.
2023-05-09 19:35
yes
2023-05-09 23:31
good investigation. you should do the same but with 10k cases maybe more
2023-05-05 18:51
1 reply
working on it now
2023-05-20 12:27
NT JasonR
2023-05-05 21:52
Nice way of spending your time
2023-05-05 23:58
1 reply
ty
2023-05-12 14:46
#34
 | 
Argentina cheapdeed
ok but how about
2023-05-06 00:07
1 reply
how about what
2023-05-06 00:41
RTP is based around 1million cases not 100.
2023-05-06 00:44
1 reply
its more than 1 million cases i think
2023-05-06 04:45
#37
 | 
Argentina utu
not big enough sample size. spend atleast 10k per code to get better data.
2023-05-06 00:47
3 replies
just spend 10k lol
2023-05-06 07:44
2 replies
#45
 | 
Argentina utu
you wouldn't run a clinical drug study on 5 people while only spending 100 dollars on supplies would you?
2023-05-06 07:45
1 reply
i think thats a bad analogy lmao
2023-05-06 08:09
U need more sample size to get relevant data, 2 accounts with one of each is not good enough
2023-05-06 00:59
1 reply
i dont have more accounts
2023-05-14 00:38
#40
 | 
China RADNIKEY
There's probably just a big variance
2023-05-06 01:00
1 reply
could be but my friends have noticed the same thing
2023-05-09 18:36
The sample isn't big enough to make such conclusion
2023-05-06 04:48
1 reply
thats what people been saying yeah
2023-05-07 08:30
#49
 | 
Belgium ouwedouwe
are there any big wins that you got like a skin that is 10 or 20x the price of the case?
2023-05-06 09:30
1 reply
nova hyper beast 28.70 coins is the best item i got on both accounts
2023-05-06 18:33
#50
 | 
India MrP!ng
Unless there is a proof by checking the code, its just another day loosing money
2023-05-06 09:31
1 reply
but i won
2023-05-11 07:46
Better idea: Get job
2023-05-09 05:56
1 reply
job to gamble
2023-05-09 15:56
What's the point of giving better odds for ones who use streamer's code?..
2023-05-09 11:06
1 reply
to get new people hooked maybe?
2023-05-09 16:08
you realize you're betting on RNG seeds/tickets and the items you "win" from the cases are meaningless, right?
2023-05-09 11:09
1 reply
what is bro talking about
2023-05-09 16:02
#65
 | 
Spain Lein04
average gambling addict
2023-05-09 11:13
1 reply
real
2023-05-09 17:06
You can't run two tests and determine whether something is true just based on the results. You'll need to take hundreds of samples to determine whether the difference is significant. In other words it could just be you happened to get luckier with JR's code, but it was just random.
2023-05-11 22:23
3 replies
my friends been noticing the same thing so its not just 2 accounts
2023-05-12 11:21
2 replies
So it's 3-4, still not a lot
2023-05-31 23:41
1 reply
maybe maybe not
2023-06-05 11:51
You dropped your tin foil hat
2023-05-14 00:43
1 reply
you dont think this could be real?
2023-05-14 02:29
someone explain to me in fnatic vs monte vertigo at the end game Boros got 31 kills but the result on hltv was 32.thanks!
2023-05-15 08:31
3 replies
what is bro on about
2023-05-18 13:23
I think HLTV counts suicides and TKs differently
2023-05-31 23:41
1 reply
LMAOO
2023-06-06 01:40
lil bros got it twisted
2023-05-15 08:40
3 replies
get it twisted. start gambling. gambling is an investment and an investment only
2023-05-17 23:08
2 replies
You can only lose 100% of your money gambling but can win 100000%+ back
2023-05-18 19:21
1 reply
the real statistic weve all been waiting for
2023-05-19 12:07
working on trying this out with 1000 cases
2023-05-23 05:23
1 reply
halfway there
2023-05-31 01:06
To understand - you need to answer the question - why is this site? I think it's just a coincidence. the sample is very small, you could get any result.
2023-05-23 06:51
1 reply
what is that question lmao
2023-05-28 15:33
I used jasonr and lost house Please report this thread!!!
2023-05-25 03:35
1 reply
gamba from macdonalds
2023-05-29 02:52
#120
 | 
Australia IBzoyy
98.7% of gamblers quit before they win big bois
2023-05-25 03:53
1 reply
real and true
2023-05-28 01:26
The fact that csgo tournaments are often held in Malta should give you a clue to how rigged this thing is. Just bet little bits and enjoy what you can afford to lose.
2023-06-05 12:12
3 replies
what do tournaments have to do with this
2023-06-11 01:05
2 replies
You can only bet in Maltese market if you are in the country. The players can match fix if they are in Malta.
2023-06-12 08:43
1 reply
no1 is talking about matchbetting
2023-06-14 00:00
Doable in the past, impossible nowadays, fkin Heroic ruined my money lol
2023-06-06 01:41
1 reply
wrong thread bro
2023-06-20 04:43
bro..?
2023-06-07 11:13
1 reply
what
2023-06-22 03:15
100 cases is not enough to draw any reasonable conclusions. Law of the market states that on average you will be at a loss.
2023-06-07 12:01
Could be a lure or a leak. If it's a lure it's designed for you to lose in the long run anyway. If it's a leak it will be fixed soon and the site may even refuse to pay you, since you've used an exploit (read T&C of the site you're using, thing like that often mentioned). 99% it's the first option and 99% the system you described actually takes place
2023-06-07 15:22
is 100 enough of a sample size?
2023-06-12 08:56
#149
INS | 
Australia JLeeT_
percentage is whack lmao
2023-06-20 04:49
It is known that betting is rigged
2023-06-23 14:11
1 reply
thats what im saying
2023-06-26 05:21
try at least 3 times using that code
2023-06-26 05:44
#155
 | 
Israel Aaron_btc
you need a bigger sample size, the rng does not work like that;D
2023-06-26 05:58
#157
 | 
Brazil hugoooo
Your sample size makes everything you said irrelevant
2023-06-30 05:25
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.
Now playing
Thumbnail for stream
Brazil
gaules
25385 viewers
Top streams
All(95)
Casters(62)
Streamers(19)
Organizers(14)
Brazil
gaules
(25385)
Other
BLAST Premier
(16093)
Other
ohnePixel
(14776)
United States
Hiko
(4308)
Other
BLAST Premier (YouTube)
(4265)
Russia
Relog Media
(3040)
United States
fl0m
(2515)
Poland
IzakOOO
(2468)
Russia
tsunamijkee
(2139)
Sweden
HeatoN
(1562)
United Kingdom
CCT
(1505)
United States
SileNt3m
(1359)
France
KRL
(1292)
Brazil
nak
(1163)
Russia
watchfulTV C
(1144)
Brazil
Liminha
(1112)
United Kingdom
ESL TV
(1022)
Argentina
forg1
(1003)
Spain
Pitu Herranz
(996)
Russia
degster
(975)
Ukraine
Maincast
(912)
Spain
FlipiN
(898)
Portugal
zorlaK
(775)
Czech Republic
PLAYzoneTV
(741)
United States
stamina
(736)
Portugal
RTP Arena
(711)
Russia
Dima
(657)
Russia
watchfulTV
(622)
Brazil
wastzera
(571)
Finland
pelaajat
(546)
Sweden
Esportstudion
(459)
Russia
Relog Media (YouTube)
(451)
Vietnam
500Bros
(429)
Denmark
PreasyTV
(396)
United Kingdom
ESL GG
(382)
Other
CCT 2
(358)
United Kingdom
Travis
(280)
Russia
watchfulTV E
(269)
Brazil
Apoka
(264)
Russia
Winline
(262)
Serbia
ArenaEsport (YouTube)
(216)
Brazil
nahzinhaa
(204)
Serbia
Fortuna (YouTube)
(187)
France
MGG 2
(186)
Brazil
peacemaker
(185)
Ukraine
IKLA
(176)
Other
BLAST.tv
(170)
Ukraine
Maincast (YouTube)
(151)
Brazil
bt0
(150)
Other
Esportal
(140)
United Kingdom
Ne0Kai
(140)
France
BeHopGG
(137)
Russia
watchfulTV D
(134)
Brazil
cogu
(132)
Germany
Fragster
(122)
Russia
Aurora
(114)
Sweden
emilio
(114)
Portugal
hdstr
(111)
Hungary
Unibet
(109)
Finland
Spamned
(102)
Kazakhstan
neaLaN
(85)
Brazil
BTSBrasilFPS
(84)
Other
Vikingz_Odin
(84)
Russia
Winline 4
(72)
Brazil
GODSENT
(68)
Denmark
Dust2 TV
(67)
Indonesia
WxC
(64)
United States
adreN
(54)
Brazil
gaules TV 6
(52)
Russia
watchfulTV B
(48)
Turkey
Tivibu Spor
(45)
Serbia
ArenaEsport
(44)
Romania
Antonia Nuckle
(44)
United Kingdom
Pinnacle Esports (YouTube)
(40)
Latvia
kleverr
(39)
Brazil
gaules TV
(39)
Argentina
NikoM
(36)
Ukraine
Maincast 2
(35)
Iran
x1ron
(32)
United Kingdom
CCT (YouTube)
(31)
Finland
AndiceCS
(27)
United Kingdom
BARDOLPH
(22)
Kazakhstan
kartash0v
(22)
Poland
CHERRY5
(18)
Russia
f6tal
(18)
Russia
flunkyflame
(14)
Denmark
wonderbai
(10)
Brazil
gaules TV 2
(10)
Spain
SOKER
(9)
Other
ACE
(6)
Other
CCT 2 (YouTube)
(4)
Brazil
Ghitto
(3)
Germany
Daniel
(2)
Ukraine
aidstar
(1)
Sweden
flusha
(0)