apple = cringe
50 replies
Yes it surely isn’t an incredibly impressive leap in spatial computing technology by the most valuable company in the world
48 replies
41 replies
+1 intelligent reply to my matter-of-fact statement
40 replies
I bet you have an iphone lmaooooooooooooooo
39 replies
38 replies
this mf has an iphone lmaooooooooooooooo
9 replies
8 replies
LMAO IPHONE CONSOOMER
6 replies
5 replies
4 replies
3 replies
2 replies
“Too much shit” lol mind referencing? All my comments were argumented as I explained my position, nothing hard to understand either
Just because u can’t accept something due to your own depravity shouldn’t be my problem, and I can only assume you are seething and projecting hard
5 replies
2 replies
>I've had several different phones
>Objectively
1 reply
Well I would love a link to that because well objectively it isn't the best phone, it doesn't even have the best camera, According to this the iphone 14 pro max is straight up inferior to the samsung s22 ultra EVEN THOUGH it came out 7 months AFTER the s22 ultra. Here are the links to the specs: gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s22_ultra_5g..
gsmarena.com/apple_iphone_14_pro_max-117..
Tell me you don't know anything about phones without telling me...
18 replies
17 replies
Nah, you're coping, paying 4 times more for the specs you have in your phone.
Many brands offer same/better hardware for less than half price.
iPhone's aren't bad phones, they are just extremelly overpriced.
If you care about quality/price balance, then a lot of things are better than iPhones.
16 replies
i couldnt care less about specs lol i want user experience and its top tier with iphones
99% of the people dont use the full potential of the hardware anyway, even with the cheap phones. ur just coping hard because u get some useless feature or like 10 extra mp for camera as if that actually changes anything
15 replies
+1, android users where sending 3fps snaps and insta videos till like late 2021 or something. probably didnt know ppl where laughing at them
something that is even mentionable in comparison costs the same anyway. same with laptops. My current surface laptop 5 costs more then a m2 mbp 13" and its such a crap pc with 25% of the mbp batterylife etc. the price argument is just not true anymore
1 reply
Lmao, you can't say "iPhone is better" and then define what it means to be better by only your standards without sounding dumb.
Just cause you do not care about specs doesn't mean other people don't.
User experience is for simpletons imo
Kids usually prefer iPhones usability I agree with that.,
But if you judging on user experience alone, you are not judging for a better phone, those are not the same thing
12 replies
It’s a huge part of it since ur basically interacting with it every single day
Why would anyone actually bother with things like processor or ram or camera? Most of the phones from the same price range are already overkill anyway regardless of the model, there’s simply no use for such powerful hardware. As for cameras, again, a lot of the phones have it roughly at the same level but apple have better processing when it comes to taking the maximum out of the camera matrix. Samsung (and asian phones in general) have a weird fetish for enhancing their cameras with a lot of stupid filters
I’ve yet to find a reasonable argument as to why iPhones are somehow worse, at most I can see a bunch of seething nerds who compare numbers and explode if they see some random phone having a bigger number in *insert here*
11 replies
10 replies
Well I only have iPhone and AirPods cuz it’s the best, never needed an ipad and never gonna switch to Mac just cuz most apps are made for windows anyway and you can build astronomical rigs for 4k gaming
But yeah I’m not saying apple are godsent lmao it’s just that iphone is next level especially when it doesn’t hurt ur wallet
9 replies
1 reply
for work mac is unbeatable. pc is better for gaming sure. you can have a cloud pc with windows 365 and run it IF you ever need windows... visual studio is now on mac, powershell as well. brining a mbp to work with lets say 20h+ usage of battery and never need to bring your charger etc is real user experience. osx is so much faster and a mbp last for so many more years then pc laptops. not even mention the trackpad...
2 replies
for laptops maybe but the idea of mac in general is pretty weird, and unless ur some music producer or video editor that uses mac only software i cant really see how it would outweigh the pc
also from the people that i know who use macbooks they usually use it as their main computer for everything, which makes it even less appealing
1 reply
i have a desktop pc as well for gaming. i spent most time creating powerpoints anyway and being in video meetings. i think its a pretty common usage of work computer. almost every system is cloudbased/accesses thru browser now days anyway
me on the other hand dosnt see a single reason to have pc laptop tbh :)
i pormise you if you would start use a macbook pro and get used to the trackpad, its so much better compared to a pc like iOS is to andiod. trust me :P
"never gonna switch to Mac just cuz most apps are made for windows anyway "
Lmao what's funny is that you could easily, by the same logic say "never gonna switch to ios just cuz most apps are made for android anyway".......
3 replies
2 replies
Are you a delusional fanboy? The numbers are public, android has more than double the ios apps
1 reply
+1 HAHA
nah the dickriding is crazy in this one. blud thinks cook will hire him
2 replies
nice bait mens
Found the poor boy
3 replies
hehe nice one :D !!
ngl, i'll watch PHUB on it all day
20 replies
You can do that with the oculus 2 tho, and it costs 300$ not 3500$
19 replies
Wait a minute. Apple VR costs 3500$? Wtf bruh
I thought it''ll cost for like 1500$ at max. I seems kinda portable, unlike oculus (i have this one)
But hell no, ain't buying.
18 replies
yep, its 3.5k
It's because it's an AR headset, the other ones are VR. Same price as the microsoft headset. They have way more sensors and it's own SOC. It's not comparable.
16 replies
lmao no there are AR headsets out there that don't have the apple tax
11 replies
bro what
10 replies
is this sentence too complex for you to process? which words you didn't understand?
9 replies
I said it's AR. Therefore it's gonna be more expensive than a VR if it's gonna be any good. And then you say ree apple tax. What does that have to do with my comment? Do you have BOM? Or what do you want me to do?
8 replies
you're like "hurr durr it's expensive because ti's AR" when there's AR headsets out there that don't cost half as much and are good. It's just apple milking that sweet sweet money off of their stupid fanbois
I don't need to see a BOM to know apple grossly overprices it's shit
7 replies
Lil bro the headset is not even out yet. Like even if it was shit you won't know until you're tried it on. Tell me how this product is any different than the first Air, Watch, iPhone or iPad? The same strategy they do over and over and over and people are still surprised. wtf.
6 replies
lil bro why do you keep bringing the timeline back to 25 years ago
the iphone was disruptive and a trend setter
keyword being was, apple hasn't come out with anything new for a long while, they're just good at making overpriced product that their 2 digit iq rabid fanbase purchase without giving it any thought (not that they can have any)
this is no exception
5 replies
I don't actually. My timeline goes back to the 70'ties. The first iPhone had major flaws in it's design and it was incredibly expensive. As was the first iPad, as was the macbook Air, watch. Look at the Lisa. 10k$, market failure but extremely impressive technology.
It's the same thing again, every time they release a new product category (for them). First gen product is meant to be a springboard to iterate upon. It's not meant to be an economic powerhouse (although they would've certainly wanted the Lisa to sell better for instance).
As with all the other products i mentioned, the first gen is a proof of concept. The price doesn't matter. What happens with the next gen, and the gen after that is the only thing you need to care about.
Let them make products that people enjoy, let them innovate or not. I don't care what you think about apple shit. Let the others catch up, let them catch up. We get better products eventually.
4 replies
my dude
you didn't drink the kool aid
you bought the whole factory and injected it directly into your veins
"I don't care what you think about apple shit." -> literally writes short novels about it
3 replies
No because it doesn't fucking matter. You don't get it. I dislike apple a lot. They're very scummy in general but it does not matter little brother, what the price of their first generation products are. They are just overpriced because that is their market strategy. like ffs. Can you even read. apple is extremely anti consumer, this has nothing to do with that. Just read.
Where is the kool aid lil bro? I'd love some.
2 replies
"I don't even like apple!" -> spends 45 messages defending apple
1 reply
I haven't defended them at all. They're an extremely scummy company. I'm providing you with context so you can understand where their prices are coming from on first gen products. You're like a twitter user. If you can't be instantly outraged about something you project your insecurity on anyone who's not part of "your tribe". Shit is so whack.
Point to where, exactly, i'm defending them. I'll wait.
3 replies
I'd love to have AR headset displaying my screen instead of two fixed ugly ass work monitors on my desk or one enormous 49 wide screen beast . Especially ones I can move and resize instantly. I want that 200" monitor where ever I go if I feel like it. I am ready to buy if the quality lives up to the expectations.
That is not up to you to decide unfortunately lil bro.
Isn't VR just kind of a gimmick?
4 replies
3 replies
It's frankly not a product meant for normal people. It's like the mac pro (the cheese grater) in that it is mostly meant for enterprise use. Apple sticking the pro moniker on it gives us some insight for who this product is intended for (ignore the iPhone pro).
2 replies
not enterprise use, this is a b2c product. but yeah, early adopters, status chasers and developers should be the target for this first launch.
2 replies
That is true. Of course it's cool and looks impressive in a way, but what additional value does it really provide to using regular screens/TV/PC/smartphone. Yeah, bigger area for movies and what not but still the whole concept of VR is kinda gimmicky at this point, as someone mentioned. I could see this becoming more common if the pricing for this tech was more affordable, but until then, it will most likely remain a niche product.
1 reply
Yeah it will likely remain as niche product, but Apple has a lot of influence so who knows. But overall like I said its good that big companies like Apple invest into this (if you like the idea of the tech). Wouldn't be surprised if other companies like Samsung followed up with their own soon. I'm not fan of Apple, but have to admit they have a lot of influence when it comes to how customers and other companies operate. They usually create a lot of competition for new stuff because other companies want to follow/put more emphasis into similar stuff.
very affordable
1 reply
Apple next level of engineering
1 reply
engineering your money into their pockets for sure lmao
Sure let me take 5 year loan to buy this thing, very excited
The sensor + screen/lens technology looks amazing, but a bunch of things that they presented as “innovations” can already be done in other vr/ar headsets that cost 1/10 of what apple wants for the vision pro.
VR is the same as holding a smartphone 1cm away from your eyes correct me if I'm wrong?
20 replies
No, VR is the same as seeing 3d objetcs irl.
5 replies
opinion rejected
4 replies
Why? i have an oculus headset.
3 replies
name flair
2 replies
btw isn't even an opinion, its a fact.
man is trash talking flairs as if he's not rocking the world flag lmao
11 replies
correct me why I am wrong, please?
6 replies
Lil bro, VR is a simulated 3D environment, you get depth perception, 360 degrees head tracking, its like you're physically present in the environment, how the fuck can you compare that to a phone screen close to your eyes?
2 replies
2 replies
graphical interfaces display images for the left and right eyes Devices of this type project images directly onto the retina of ur eyes, VR uses the display of an ordinary smartphone.
1 reply
It has special 3d lens tho u dumbfuck and the image is rendered differently for each eye, stop being poor and try a vr
3 replies
dude, apple has the dumbest users fan base with IQ below 60,
what do you expect
... you can't though.
True. It's like back in the day when you just placed your phone in that piece of cardboard.
VR: Virtual Reality. Screen in a virtual 3D space with axis tracking.
AR: Normal space but with digital scenes on top. Can also do normal VR.
3 replies
;p
imagine. the pixels would be so big. or minecraft. ha
Pavlov is close enough and pretty decent
I like it , it is very cyber
3400 is steep but it's almost like they don't want you to buy it yet
I'd say 2-4 years it will develop nicely, unless it gets cucked off
I trust apple, so far their products have done well
I want to believe this will be no exception
I like all things cyber and this is super cyber
Look up Prospera from gundam witch
LOL
4 replies
apple products are not bad but they don't justify the price difference to competition products
2 replies
wait till 2026 when the product is more re-fined and smaller. this one too bulky.
I think they overestimated the amount of deposable income the average person has.
3 replies
my dude they sell $1k+ smartphones to poor people in need of looking rich, the know exactly how much to milk their idiots
1 reply
I guess we will see how it does.
I don't get how it's transparent and shows the wearer's eyes, yet it has screens and motors and all shit ????
Looks like vaporware
4 replies
3 replies
nah i'm positive you can, the glass is like google glass or something you can see through it and it has stuff projected on the glass that you can see.
2 replies
It's a screen on the outside showing you a replay of your face it is not transparent. It's AR with cameras, not like google glass.
Its entry consumer grade stuff so its ok. Quest is probably still better for the Link features so even if Meta bricks the whole thing it still can work with your PC. If you are actually interested in VR and on this website I would assume you have a PC that is half way ok, so I would just recommend getting an actually good headset.
if the price comes close to regular VR in the next few yeasr, maybe buy
3500$
they seriously think people are gonna buy it ?! (excluding braindead apple fanboys)
2 replies
geared towards onlyfans, developers, big money, and people who write off stuff like mr beast. etc.
4 replies
Lol thats not how it works
3 replies
1 reply
7 replies
for a porn it should be enough
4 replies
Overkill, 15min is enough,
3min set up
10min find right video
2min jacking it in San Francisco
3 replies
6 hour version inthe works
1 reply
They will demand more money for a worse VR than even cheapest brands sell.
sounds cool
I much FPS can I get for cs2 go?
kringe
1 reply
Going to buy it for fun
4 replies
will help doctors diagnose patients and surgeons for sure.
maybe even au pairs and nurses too.
3 replies
if that gonna cost less than 8k i am not buying it.
any pre-orderers?
the idea is really cool but that price tag means it'll never work as a consumer product except for extreme productivity enthusiasts like super high profile accountants or something who work from home. Another way it could work is through company sponsored products for senior executives who could benefit from the productivity boost. It's still hard to see a company justifying a 100k$ technology expense on getting like 30 of these for a big companies important VP+ positions.
2 replies
1 reply
+1 yeah, it's an exciting product for sure, even if the price isn't right today
The AD looked kewl, but will be shit IRL and not used effectively.
1 reply
Yeah I am waiting for user reviews before making any opinions... ad looks insane but the question is if it is going to look irl like in the ad
why the fk all apple videos spammed with AMZT30 comments?
3 replies
not really. they can make millions off the apps for this item.
2 replies
nothing, dont care
cringe
What to say here ... Apple did it again, first AR is milestone as iPod and iPhone were. Shots fired to Google and Microsoft. Sure it's bulky and pricey for now as with any first tech but like it or not it's the future unlike VR boxes.
What I question is comfort wearing it for many hours every day, whether it wouldn't ruin the eye vision.
2 replies
1 reply
Ofc it won't be for everyone like a phone but it'll surely find its place be it lonely ppl or professional fields or anything in between, eventually price and size will go down, usability will go up and marketing will do the rest. Not to mention this tech opens the door to developing and implementation in other ways.
Don't like Apple but I have to commend them. Their way of doing AR is impressive.
Also, this means more support to VR/AR by app developers which is always a good thing for an emerging tech.
Until a review is out its all bullshit
Companies need to take an L on the whole VR and metaverse is the future bullshit.... Honestly you could buy so much stuff for 3500$, but i think they do this on purpose to make it more desireable im sure they'll get a lot of advertisement with that price by youtubers putting it in their thumbanails and celebs flexing it. I think this is the most stupid thing yet (apart from that app that tracks your feelings they showed which.... yea...) Honestly VR is fun when experiencing some games but for most things its just not very convenient. There are loads of better alternatives for everything the "google glasses 2.0" does. But apple shills will still call others delusional bc they cant see the "groundbreaking inovation" in front of their eyes
2 replies
Pretty boring. Doesn't seem much better than the Quest 3 but is seven times the price...
i dont car
2h battery for a wannabe Minority Report, not quite there yet
ion giva fuc
Google glass but 10 years too late and with shitty cable needed to be plugged. Also it's more like a Ski mask than glasses. Stuff is huge and probably heavy.
To me this is a sign that apple is losing itself. Apple was all about making things wireless, light and easy. This apple ski mask is bulky, wired and 10 years later than google glass.
What's the point really of opening your emails in your glasses instead than on your phone? It's just a $3500 gadget that won't bring anything new to your usage.
Now playing
shroud
29561 viewers
Top streams
All(34)
Casters(12)
Streamers(17)
Organizers(5)
shroud
(29561)
summit
(8606)
fer
(4232)
Stewie2k
(3043)
XANTARES (YouTube)
(2551)
Luken
(2163)
mch
(1493)
ESL TV
(894)
Saullo
(844)
bt0
(444)
NikoM
(427)
Limitless
(390)
Liminha
(351)
cogu
(264)
Gamers Club
(262)
CyberFocus
(256)
just9n
(242)
JoJo
(166)
Trucklover86
(145)
Vikingz_Odin
(80)
SHOOWTiME
(76)
bENITA
(44)
Rato Feliz
(42)
johny__cs
(42)
anger
(30)
Lobockz
(29)
1pv
(27)
CCT 2 (YouTube)
(26)
BTSBrasilFPS
(23)
Polen
(23)
JokerBR
(16)
CCT (YouTube)
(13)
DAVEY
(12)
Game Arena
(7)
