1 - Imperial
2 - Vitality
3 - Heroic
4 - FaZe
5 - ENCE
I mean it's wrong because many t1 teams flopped so hard, so on the one hand you can't really blame it, but on the other hand it's just wrong obviously..
it's not like the rankings are manual, there are certain calculations and that's just how it is. might be stupid at times.
The top 10 teams are usually fine, just some partner teams on the outside of top 10 would be lower if they couldn't farm points from partner invites, and therefore the top tier 2 teams would be higher
To have accurate rankings, all teams would need start playing events with same starting point.
So no invites, partner teams etc., but having multi layered event for all teams. Open quali (or at least open for TOP100 teams), than group stage and then play offs.
With something like this we could see which teams are really good, if fluke really exists or just most of the "TOP" teams have inflated ranking.
i only dislike the fact that NA teams are always too high on rankings despite being just ridiculous at games and playing like it was deathmatch. also the "newest event is more important" makes no sense to me, it should be a season thing imo
If you think otherwise you are delusional.
but that's just me personally
1. Virtus Pro 2015
Hltv's ranking is fine, can be a bit weird sometimes but it's all made with calculations so it is what it is.
2. ENCE Academy
the rest is the same
Rankings should be based on chess elo system, where's you gain more/lose more points playing higher/lower tier teams, i.e. Vitality wouldn't have gained much in terms of ranking in France as they only faced 1 t1 team, and GL would have gained a substantial jump in rankings with the teams that they beat.
And when you all are ranking teams, what time frame are you basing it on? Last week? Last event? Last month? Last 6 months? Last year? It's all subjective.
1. spirit academy