Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Valve angery at "partnered teams" ecosystem
 | 
Other gomonya 
RL tweet: twitter.com/RLewisReports/status/1667158.. From his article: During those meetings Valve voiced concerns about the current state of the competitive landscape and said that something had to be done about the current partnered leagues if they wanted to be issued with a tournament license for CS2. Valve finally coming to dismantle the partnered system? Will we see more t2 teams clapping t1 team's ass more often? What sneaky ways will ESL and Blast use to keep their partnered system?
2023-06-09 20:49
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#1
 | 
Russia ZirgaGalva
W valve cause now we have shit like vitality or heroic in top5 who cant play shit
2023-06-09 20:50
9 replies
#13
 | 
Serbia pravac
0/8
2023-06-09 20:57
1 reply
fr. huge flag + flair from that guy
2023-06-10 07:25
#26
 | 
Brazil Zrz0
someone wake this man up
2023-06-09 21:58
1 reply
Nah let him sleep Better for everyone
2023-06-10 07:28
#30
 | 
Germany who|cars
bro what
2023-06-10 07:23
#36
 | 
India G4bbaR
Bro forgot Faze and G2
2023-06-10 07:36
1 reply
#44
 | 
Russia ZirgaGalva
didnt know they re top5 sorry
2023-06-10 08:01
who is better?
2023-06-10 10:17
based
2023-06-10 16:18
#2
 | 
United States Jakkkk
Great for competition, bad for the longevity of these orgs
2023-06-09 20:51
8 replies
#5
 | 
United States qoietsammy
EG going out of business wouldn't be a bad thing though
2023-06-09 20:52
5 replies
Don't get me wrong, EG are absolute shit but they are a legacy org with long history and it would be a shame to lose them.
2023-06-09 21:00
3 replies
#18
 | 
United States qoietsammy
you're not wrong, but the fact that they are still partnered with sooooo many other teams surpassing them is just ridiculous at this point
2023-06-09 21:05
Tag is legendary. But management so trash right now
2023-06-10 07:17
Many teams had a long history and disappeared. aAa, SK, etc.
2023-06-10 17:52
forgot these guys already are they even playing anymore?
2023-06-10 14:52
#7
NAF | 
Canada Jraptorr
There is many ways valve can help subsidize these tournaments for orgs tbh.
2023-06-09 20:53
fuk the orgs, game integrity is the most important
2023-06-10 16:17
just make there be relegation for main league make 2-3 lower tier leagues, reduce spot price over how many teams are getting added over every league, leave 1-2 open spots for qualifiers on the lowest league so teams can go higher if they're good enough over time 2 last place teams from each league get relegated, if youend up last X amount of times on lowest tier you're out
2023-06-09 20:53
1 reply
#22
 | 
Other gomonya
I like this idea. But you can improve it. Big orgs want to keep themselves in T1 scene because money, and viewers want to watch T1 teams because of popularity. I think a better way to do this league is let the orgs retain the T1 league slots, but with a twist. Use the regular league system with promotion and demotion. Once the top 8/16/whatever teams for the T1 league is finalized, the big orgs will bid to buy one of the T1 teams. You do this every new season. So lower teams can come up and get nice contracts with big orgs, and upper teams have their ass lit to keep up their skill or risk losing org money.
2023-06-09 21:19
Hope partner system will stay in cs2 and improves. I don't want to watch some boring tier-2 playoff games like it was at Paris major.
2023-06-09 20:52
22 replies
Major's problem is the bad format and seeding. Normal tournaments will generally have the best teams making it to the playoffs as they did before. It won't affect the best teams if there isn't an automatic partner team slot, it'll just affect the garbage partner teams like eg.
2023-06-09 20:57
19 replies
#42
 | 
Russia shoras
Having the best teams reaching playoffs 100% of the time is also boring. Gotta give some chance for the underdogs.
2023-06-10 07:55
9 replies
And it does happen. But it should happen naturally and not because of a bad seeding or format. If the format and matchups are good it makes the underdog stories even better when they do happen
2023-06-10 09:02
8 replies
seeding was good, what are you even trying to prove? :D worst team played best team and best team lost, how is that seeding fault?
2023-06-10 10:19
7 replies
I'm not trying to prove anything. Everyone knows the major circuit has an awful seeding
2023-06-10 10:46
6 replies
#60
 | 
Russia shoras
What's wrong with seeding though? If one good team goes through a stage 3-0 and the other barely makes it 3-2 in the last possible opportunity, makes sense to put them against each other as highest seed vs lowest seed. It's not like the seeding should be done by hltv rating in the middle of the tournament?
2023-06-10 11:04
5 replies
It does make sense in all bo3 format. In current major format, where a team can win 2 bo1 and 1 bo3 to qualify 3-0 - giving them the highest seed doesn't mean this team is the strongest and 3-2 team is the weakest one.
2023-06-10 11:13
2 replies
#65
 | 
Russia shoras
I guess every match being bo3 would take too long, making it more expensive to run a major. However one could argue a top 10 team should still win bo1s against top 30 teams.
2023-06-10 11:21
1 reply
Same as saying "top football team should still win 1st half in a match vs underdog". Less time, less attempts = more probability to fluke. I would suggest removing challengers stage and make major as one big group stage + playoffs with bo3 only.
2023-06-10 12:13
As an example because every seeding is based on just the previous stage of the major the first round matchups might easily include two top 5 teams playing each other while other match has two top 20 teams. Teams from those two games can't be accurately seeded based on clearly different level of opponent. Teams are seeded by ranking/previous achievements in any regular tournament because that's much more accurate than just the previous swiss stage of the same event with same seeding problems.
2023-06-10 11:52
1 reply
Just switch to same system we had in Kato -18 (if I remember correctly). Legends phase has it own seeding (done by something like HLTV teams rating or let teams ”decide” the order). Would give most fair match-ups
2023-06-10 13:22
There was no problem in the major teams who won their games went on to the playoffs teams who lost their games took the next flight home
2023-06-10 17:54
8 replies
K, but by that logic nobody can ever criticize any format or seeding
2023-06-10 18:41
7 replies
K, but in the end it doesn't matter the format. When your "t1" teams shit the bed, they shit the bed. It's not the TO's fault.
2023-06-10 20:37
6 replies
Everyone sensible knows tier 1 teams are all awful at the moment and nobody blames the underdogs for doing well. But the format does matter going forward to next majors even if it isn't an excuse for anyone's results.
2023-06-10 21:55
5 replies
you are literally bitching about the tournament's format, and the only reason you're doing this is because your favorite team shat the bed and forgot to win their games against supposedly easy opponents
2023-06-11 00:47
4 replies
Lmao no, how dumb can you be? I tried to explain as simply as possible for you to understand that it's not an excuse for any teams but you still don't get it.
2023-06-11 13:54
3 replies
Excuse me sir but you have negative IQ #12 "Major's problem is the bad format and seeding"
2023-06-11 16:17
2 replies
You can't fathom a concept where the format is bad and the teams suck at the same time?
2023-06-11 16:36
1 reply
All I can hear from your mouth is WAAAAH WAAAAAH WAAAAAH
2023-06-11 16:36
+1
2023-06-10 10:59
Yeah, let's have Faze G2 Vitality Navi Heroic Ence Cloud9 in semi finals of every event 10 events in a row
2023-06-10 12:33
20 f* years with a game they don't care or don't listen community even when it reports them millions of benefits and suddenly they are concerned about the circuit
2023-06-09 20:52
4 replies
#21
 | 
Other gomonya
CS2 new game. Volvo let tournament organizers run free in CSGO to see if they fix themself. They didn't so Volvo come in now and change things for CS2.
2023-06-09 21:14
3 replies
Let's hope vitality can face tier 3 teams in all the events to win them! Let's go!!!
2023-06-09 21:38
2 replies
#24
 | 
Other gomonya
Tier 3 Imperial too hard maybe try Tier 4.
2023-06-09 21:47
Imperial that destroyed them or Apeks that pushed them to Round 29 on both maps?
2023-06-10 12:25
Based valve. But don't act like ESL and Blast are equal in the way they use partnerships cause Blast is much worse. And tier 2 teams won't suddenly become better than tier 1 even if the partner team spots were removed.
2023-06-09 20:54
2 replies
Yeah to get into a Blast event, ENCE has to qualify for qualifiers for Showdowns where one team can get through to the main event. Meanwhile ESL Pro League is like half partnered teams and half non-partnered teams.
2023-06-09 20:58
1 reply
Yep, and for all IEM events as well good portion of the teams get invited based on their ranking. Meanwhile team like C9 despite being a top 5 team has never got to Blast events without going through Showdown
2023-06-09 21:06
#9
 | 
Qatar PSG_Top1
lol they should just stop doing tournaments then they are losing money when mostly t1 teams play, imagine if it wasnt fluke-proof there would be so much less viewership
2023-06-09 20:54
Valve is right. This riot system sucks, competitions are meant to be skill based, not money based. Too bad this system already took over the zoomers brains and they will always complain and give their dogshit takes everytime a T2 beats a T1.
2023-06-09 20:54
1 reply
Literally #4 KEKW
2023-06-10 16:37
W move by Volvo Rn BLAST circuit is ridiculously open While ESL is way better in that aspect
2023-06-09 20:56
as they should be
2023-06-09 20:58
In my opinion CS needs The International. Dota has majors but The International is the cherry on top of the cake. Valve needs to step up and bring this tournament to Counter Strike. Major for 500k is okay. TI for $## 000 000 will be the pinnacle. Thank you.
2023-06-09 21:00
7 replies
TI would destroy the scene, in dota teams only care about TI during a whole year
2023-06-10 07:51
4 replies
that's literally not true lol
2023-06-10 10:20
3 replies
it is Gaimin have convincingly won the last two majors and yet nobody will give two shits about their success if they don't win TI. The OG lineup that won TI back-to-back is hailed as one of the greatest of all time, yet that is literally all they accomplished together. They did not win a single other tier 1 event with that lineup, but nobody remembers this fact since winning TI overshadows it. TI has this almost cult-like following around it where people would throw away their entire paychecks just to see the prize pool be bigger so that they can brag about how big it is.
2023-06-10 11:19
2 replies
People care about who wins other tournaments but TI. OG won like 5+ majors with the same core and people care and mention it, I don't know what are you waffling about. TI in CSGO is never gonna happen, but it would definitely be good for the game. Also Saudis are hosting huge tournaments (for example this liquipedia.net/dota2/Riyadh_Masters/2022 ) in dota now, so it's definitely not 1 tournament a year game. :D
2023-06-10 11:23
1 reply
2 of those majors were with the same core of Notail, jerax and ana. The others weren't. People care way more about the TI wins than those majors; last year OG won 2 majors with bzm and Yuragi, but fans would drop them in a heartbeat if it meant ana and Topson would rejoin the main roster - even though neither has proven themselves at the highest caliber in ages - simply because of their mythical TI wins. Like I said, the OG lineup which won TI twice did not win anything else, consistently placing 7-8th at other tier 1 events in 2018-19, whilst teams like Secret, Vici, LGD, Liquid and VP consistently won majors and other big events throughout that time, but those wins are an afterthought for most people, as they are massively overshadowed by OG's TI wins. TI is simply too big for its own good. The Saudi thing looks nice at first, but look at the ridiculous prize pool it takes to rival TI. This simply cannot be sustained, especially since Dota's player numbers have been on the down since 2016.
2023-06-10 13:13
International is terrible idea...
2023-06-10 07:58
I think ti will be amazing for cs
2023-06-10 20:10
Hopefully, it is almost impossible for non Blast partner to win a Blast event
2023-06-09 21:07
What partnered system does is puts vast majority of money into pockets of very few people, fucking everyone else over. It makes ranking absolutely useless, you get points for paying money to TO's It makes CS less competitive. It's in interest of a small minority of people to keep it, I am glad Volvo is putting it's foot down.
2023-06-09 21:51
how about valve actually do something for the scene. majors are just not enough.
2023-06-09 22:05
lets go tired of seeing eg or complexity getting clapped every time
2023-06-10 07:21
#32
 | 
Germany who|cars
w move reduce 3 major slot +add partner system into major
2023-06-10 07:25
GL Monte and ITB make it to the top 20 and can't even defend their spot because they are not in any big tourney atm
2023-06-10 07:30
"During those meetings Valve voiced concerns about the current state of the competitive landscape" They should be concerned about the current state of the game. boring maps, trash anti cheat, trash matchmaking, no updates, no communication with the community
2023-06-10 07:34
3 replies
#37
 | 
Germany who|cars
with valvo not even caring about the game ppl still buying these cases and keys sad truth
2023-06-10 07:44
they work on the biggest update since CS (1.x cs:S and csgo) were released.
2023-06-10 16:32
they are not concerned because they are making more money from csgo than ever currently
2023-06-11 17:54
ESL isnt super bad (there could still be improvmenets though) but BLAST surely needs a change
2023-06-10 07:49
1 reply
+1
2023-06-10 11:58
#41
 | 
Denmark DoomTurtle
i hate franchise leagues so go right ahead valve! shit teams (EG, Astralis) gets boosted on world ranking for just showing up and loosing.... then better newer teams get to fight 1000 for 1 slot.. stupid system
2023-06-10 07:54
Can't wait for NIP and BIG to lose at least 10 places in the ranking ;) Sad thing is, people love watch their beloved orgs and think that actually better teams got "lucky". Heroic fanbois crying because They got outplayed by Gamerlegion. Navi fanbois crying because Monte shit on them and NIP still crying cuz Apeks was literally better team. Huge W for Valve. If it happens, entire team ranking and top players ranking will change.
2023-06-10 09:36
4 replies
+1 And better players and teams will rise to the top eventually anyway, we'll simply get higher quality cs
2023-06-10 11:24
nt, apeks lost 1-2 to nip's academy team
2023-06-10 13:15
1 reply
Yeah, at some tier2 online tournament, but on lan / stage they were insane.
2023-06-10 14:50
#83
RpK | 
France HippzZ
Based
2023-06-10 16:08
fUHCK PARTNERS. it will probably be 60-90% partners still. ed: which is still good and better than before but not the fair and equal treatment we want.
2023-06-10 09:37
Finally. Partner events ruining the scene. It's okay to have spots for invited teams/partners, but they basically created closed events, with hardly any chances for non-partners to qualify.
2023-06-10 10:04
We want competition, this is sports. No franchise bullshit like USA.
2023-06-10 10:56
3 replies
#89
 | 
United States Phamous3k
Funny seeing that CSGO is a USA game.
2023-06-10 16:21
2 replies
#102
 | 
France poulpup
Funny seeing USA is an EU country
2023-06-10 17:16
1 reply
#109
 | 
United States Phamous3k
Uhhhhh yeh, ok... But CSGO was published and developed in America. No debate there lol.
2023-06-10 17:44
Hope blast changes their ways, pointless tournament
2023-06-10 11:02
I would say max 25% of the participants can be partnered teams.
2023-06-10 11:16
Well yes, partnered system suck, but I just hope that they dont make Valorant like system just worst.
2023-06-10 11:21
Very good.
2023-06-10 11:23
#69
 | 
Russia Reph
This partnership system sucks. I remind that EG wastes every of their spots in tournaments where they are "partnered team".
2023-06-10 11:35
1 reply
#141
 | 
Europe kuu1
Yeah, but seeing them lose is still rather entertaining. And they did have a single win versus a top team, as I think they beat Heroic.
2023-06-12 04:18
#70
 | 
Czech Republic czRamtin03
Sure And what's gonna happen afterwards? Bankrupt? people losing even more money? Common Valve logic
2023-06-10 11:40
13 replies
#91
 | 
United States Phamous3k
Less orgs… Less investment… Possibly turn regions into NA lol. But whatever. People think this grassroots open circuit is good for a niche market. Having a CSGO team is expensive af but, we’re like fuvk those orgs till they’re all gone. Idk. We’ll see….
2023-06-10 16:23
6 replies
or orgs that live too far above their money level leave and good and hard-working orgs have a fair chance. Orgs as mouz and Liquid will have finally the chance to profit from their serious work. While Orgs as c9 vanish
2023-06-10 16:27
5 replies
#97
 | 
United States Phamous3k
No, there’s no profiting in esports. It’s very very rare an org turns over a profit. CSGO is one of the most expensive teams to invest in and on top of that there’s no sustainability for orgs. Companies need some kind of ROI… So, you’ll only have a handful of orgs willing to invest Just look at NA… Asia… Oceania… Heck, even SA. Europe is the only continent that build ton of organic support & structure.
2023-06-10 16:33
4 replies
Still there are orgs that do serious work and don't throw money away. And Mouz had low investments but great success. To stay for so long on German players had a good reason. Low investment and "big" success. Same as Liquid who invested smartly. Such Orgs can survive without a money printer in the background. And even Ence made a "profit" last year.
2023-06-10 16:38
3 replies
#108
 | 
United States Phamous3k
I doubt any org is making a prpfit especially if they're a private company. They can say anhything... Reason why publically traded companies have to showcase there margins so, we dont be fooled. Anyways, Open-circuit is in no way sustainable and it's proven. You have the wealthiest nation not even attempting to invest in one of the biggest esports in the world. You have Asia barely invested... South America looks to be struggling somewhat. It's just not a profitable business model and it'll never be.
2023-06-10 17:42
2 replies
CS was always an EU game and that will never change. And Europe hates franchises. Valve knows that it is a culture thing that every part of the world have different esports. Asia is a big MOBA ground, while Brazil is still a full football nation and NA loves more console games that is why Halo or COD is there bigger
2023-06-10 17:45
1 reply
#111
 | 
United States Phamous3k
CoD is huge... Halo uhhhhh that last one didnt do us any favors lol. Asia plays tactical FPS games though... Sudden Attack is one of the most played games in Korea... Japan is heavy into R6.... And the biggest tactical shooter CrossFire is China. So, if Valve actually worked on developing a scene Asia would be huge just like in Val. They market, brand, develop leagues, use streamers, market there products etc. Just saying CSGO can get Asia.
2023-06-10 17:48
cs survived all these years without big money in the pro scene, because of their love of the game.
2023-06-10 16:24
5 replies
#98
 | 
United States Phamous3k
CSGO will never die but, these orgs investing and paying huge salaries will. It’s unsustainable. Hence tons of orgs are already gone.
2023-06-10 16:34
1 reply
I can live with it when the garbage player doesn't earn 10k for shit work. They should depend on the salary more on success.
2023-06-10 16:39
2023-06-10 17:21
2 replies
and still good orgs will be there for a long time. German and swedish scene have a tons of teams you never heard of before. But they exist for 5+ years
2023-06-10 17:22
1 reply
Ofc there are a lot of orgs out there that are really good in Dota, Rocket League and League of Legends as well but they would be in the same spot But paying a salary that you could surive on for 5 years to each player... 250k in total for FaZe monthly Orgs are keeping tournaments alive cuz Valve wants to keep its money
2023-06-10 19:20
hide the fact of partnership, say these teams are just "invited" lul
2023-06-10 13:14
Dude, then invest more in the game prize pool so that no one chooses partner teams to orginize tournaments.
2023-06-10 13:15
2 replies
#84
 | 
Pakistan LoOuU2
the players of the teams that are part of the partnered organizations dont rely on prize pools as their main source of income , it`s just added bonus.
2023-06-10 16:13
1 reply
#94
 | 
United States Phamous3k
Yeah, players depend on a orgs salary but, orgs need some sort of sustainability to continue operations. Those partnered leagues come with ad revenue, ticket sales etc. We act like these orgs can keep bleeding money without consequence. So, if Valve removes partnered leagues it’ll suck lol. It’ll definitely change the landscape at this stage in the game.
2023-06-10 16:28
Most fair system should be 30 teams and each of them playing one match with each other through 30 days. No luck, no excuses about easier group etc
2023-06-10 16:16
5 replies
#107
 | 
France poulpup
And very boring also because too much matchs
2023-06-10 17:29
4 replies
Bro, none forcin you to watching any of them.
2023-06-10 19:40
3 replies
#122
 | 
France poulpup
Yes and most won't look at them Gg ez fair game but boring one Need to find the right middle
2023-06-11 00:32
2 replies
Bro, for rxample i watching matches with team i cheer for, lol. Is anyone on this forum who is watching every match? kekw.
2023-06-11 10:58
1 reply
#132
 | 
France poulpup
for a tournament with regular format I might
2023-06-11 17:47
Great news!
2023-06-10 16:23
That's actually awesome. Fraud teams like shit2 are in a lot of trouble now.
2023-06-10 17:18
#106
 | 
Russia Haess
Really nice btw. A lot of people think that last 2 majors was just a fluke but major is the only 1 tournament where t2-3 teams can compete with t1 teams and all this shit partnership systems really harmful for great t2 teams. I promise in cs2 it will be better
2023-06-10 17:24
Rich orgs will stay on top and t2 teams won't do much. As the history shows top teams quickly adapt to fluke t2 teams and dismantle them in the next few tournaments. So giving equal opportunities is partially a good solution, but this increases the chances that a fluke team like gambit or outsiders winning a major which is extremely sad.
2023-06-10 17:55
#117
 | 
Serbia Provizija
common valve win
2023-06-10 19:22
I think what happens is ESL and especially blast let in more teams through qualifiers and possibly Valve gives lesser tournament operators more chances to host big tournaments. Maybe they implement a dota-like system or turn the RMRs into a decent tournament instead of a shit qualifier.
2023-06-11 13:57
#128
NEO | 
Poland Breno5
W Valve
2023-06-11 16:18
If valve are willing to compensate with money from their pocket then TOs will do it. If not then valve can just stfu and drown in their cases/skins money
2023-06-11 16:24
great
2023-06-11 17:49
It will drop the salarys for t1 teams and the salary will be more even between t1 and the real t2 teams.
2023-06-11 17:50
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.
Now playing
Thumbnail for stream
Brazil
gaules
3235 viewers
Top streams
All(18)
Casters(10)
Streamers(6)
Organizers(2)
Brazil
gaules
(3235)
United States
Stewie2k
(2670)
United States
Cooper
(1501)
United Kingdom
ESL TV
(1213)
Hong Kong
CyberGames Arena (YouTube)
(475)
Other
TaZ
(249)
Brazil
cogu
(204)
Brazil
Jogando Junto
(192)
Germany
zonixx
(170)
Brazil
fbz
(166)
Denmark
wonderbai
(119)
Germany
kRYSTAL
(104)
Brazil
mch
(95)
Other
Vikingz_Odin
(63)
South Africa
TelkomVSG
(61)
Canada
FaNg
(50)
Brazil
BTSBrasilFPS
(5)
Brazil
BTSBrasilCSGO
(1)