And who said BO1 was a trash system? certainly not me, if teams lose BO1s, then they just have to get better, it's just an easy excuse for the losing fans, they can act like it wasn't a real match because it was BO1
Also, more than half of the criticism towards Vitality comes from Navi/Navi players flairs, so maybe you're the one being biased, don't you think?
I'm neutral on that, Vitality is not the team I cheer for, but if you think that Vitality didn't deserve that major, or that they weren't clearly the best team at the time, then you're either baiting or extremely biased
And if you think their run was easy (not comparing to Navi or whatever other team, I don't care about that kind of camparison, Navi 100% deserved their major as well), then how come all the other apparently good teams lost with similar runs? How come Navi lost to Monte (0-2 in a BO3)? How come ENCE lost to Nip (0-2 as well)? How come G2 lost to Fnatic (BO3 as well)? How come Heroic lost to GamerLegion? I can go on and on, but maybe it's because it's not so easy after all?
Don't you think it's weird how all these teams that lost these supposedly meaningless BO1s ended up getting eliminated when they played so-called weaker opponents in BO3s? That's because these BO1s are not meaningless, and they were just not good enough.