still counts no?
Why would we compare 1.00 to 2.00?
Looking at Hunden during rating 1.0 he has like 2 maps against top 5 teams and a .57 rating. That's because before that there was no ranking so you cant calculate it so I have to question why you used "vs. top 5 teams" as the criteria
in 2014 he has a .65 rating 1.00 at big events
he has .88 and .92 in 2013 and 2012 respectively, but I'm not sure exactly was the correlation is of 1.00 to 2.00 and just because he played big events doesnt mean he played top 5 teams
Unless you go and give me a link having picked out the top 5 teams during 2014, 2013, and 2012 and showed me Hunden's rating 1.00 for that, then giving me a conversion from 1.00 to 2.00 and proving that his rating at that time was .74 you are just saying an opinion with nothing backing it up.
I give you stats and prove why Jt is better individually using facts, and you say "oh no dont count that cause it's at the end of his career". That shouldn't mean anything, he was still playing the best teams in the world and that's the rating he had.