if you were close with the score and the guy left and one vote for surrender this is a minus it automatically accepts it.
haven't encountered this yet but something weird happened to one of my games yesterday, the scoreboard was clearly displaying there was 10 secs left but the round ended before that and we won it since the Ts didn't plant, but how is that even a thing ?
because volvo as usual completely fucked the game, csgo>>>>>>>>>cs2
I guess its because in CSGO often if there was a surrender vote, whoever voted yes, but it didn't go through would often either troll or just go afk anyway
Coz its like that, and thats the way it is
surrender vote doesnt even work for me. started a game 4v5 and we ff vote round 1, all 4 vote yes and nothing happens lol. something even weirder with the surrender vote is that you can change your vote and spam yes/no
It's ridiculous. I'd understand it if it was three out of four f1 votes needed but even two is too low, I don't understand how they've figured 1 would be enough.
So valve improves something and you complain.
I had so many games where 1 idiots leaves and im stuck in a useless match for 20min just because one presses F2. This command is so good for solo players.
Ps: i find it hard that you were winning after the guy left. If you were he guy wouldnt disconnect.
I've been in winning 4v5's before several times, classic games!
But never have I been in a winning 4v5 where there was a vote to surrender called. Could be chance but I think it's probably because those games became a 3v5 at best.
I do agree that one person voting to end a game isn't fair, perhaps a better approach from Valve would be to allow players to leave without penalty when someone abandons. Then you could've attempted your 3v5 and the other guy didn't have to sit through a challenge he didn't sign up for.
Fun fact: your team can not win a surrender vote after you kicked a player. 4/4 will not be enough.
yeah fkin remove this shit man wtf