Thread has been deleted
Last comment
World Yes Bro? 
First LAN for them, & what an Awesome Match. Great Play by Na'vi, RESPECT to them. GL to VG!!
2013-02-24 16:34
yeah sick matches
2013-02-24 16:35
pls dont create more topics about navi etc
2013-02-24 16:37
sweden fanboys can create 65879273897 topics about "NiP > ALL", why ppl cant create about navi ?
2013-02-24 16:39
do you word like etc? its means all topics like NIP > all navi > all sourcers stupid idiots etc etc
2013-02-24 16:43
fuck logic -.-'
2013-02-24 16:52
Russia Nzr0 
Don't try to "sound" smart,when you use "etc.",you need to also use a comma,before it. Probably you "said" "etc." just to sound more smart and to after make excuses,nice try.
2013-02-24 17:22
nobody is doing topics like that
2013-02-25 19:03
STFU, You make 100 topics, about fnatic rooster change, you post your fantasy wet dreams about you sleeping with fnatic players, & your here talking shit. Please GTFO the thread if you dont like it. Thank You.
2013-02-24 16:47
ofc where i create topics about fnatic players? where ? please get a life
2013-02-24 16:49
Fnatic changed their rooster? what will help them get up in the morning now?
2013-02-24 17:45
2013-02-25 14:55
HAHAHHAHAH rispekt for losing game uahuaquhauhauhaahu n1 logic + they lose vs saucers so rly bad result efter al
2013-02-24 16:39
Poland joeb 
Isn't it source-based game?
2013-02-24 16:39
DotA 2 is a source engine game too. Your point is..?
2013-02-24 16:41
Poland joeb 
It is wide known source players were able to get used to GO a little bit faster than 1.6 players did, thanks to the similarities between GO and source.
2013-02-24 16:44
Yeah and that's why NiP, a team with 3 1.6ers is dominating everyone
2013-02-24 16:47
They are better because of the aim, tactics and because all 5 are round changers, all of them can clutch 1v3s.
2013-02-24 16:49
exactly which similarities are you talking about? guns are different recoil is different hitboxes are different maps are different (only inferno is a slightly modified source map; mirage is a 1.6 map; dust2 was made from scratch; train is absolutely new too; nuke is only similar to source because it has fast vents and window flashes, it has a lot of major differences from source nuke which change the entire gameplay). pistols are similar neither to 1.6 nor to source (glock is weak in source just like in 1.6, there's no p250 in source etc). the moneysystem changes ($900 guns, $2700AK, $400 defusers, +$300 for bomb planting etc) were only introduced in GO. flashes are weak just like in 1.6, smokes are like in source (keep in mind that source smokes have been like 1.6 smokes before 2011). grenade trajectory is different. awp jumping penalty was only introduced in CSGO. probably the only real similarities between source and csgo are lack of tagging and wallspamming, the fact that grenades don't hit through walls and lower falldamage. that's hardly a serious advantage. besides, navi had a serious advantage on mirage (the map was NEVER played in source), yet they still lost. people say CSGO is easier for source players because they want to have excuses ready when 1.6 teams lose to source teams. however VeryGames are a telling example that these people are wrong. VG have a lot of problems adapting to the game, in the last 3 weeks they've lost to imG, ALTERNATE, Anexis and twice to n!faculty. All of these teams couldn't touch them in CS:S.
2013-02-24 17:14
the gamestyle surely is closer to CSS as the game is similar when it comes to grenades (more opportunities for flashes, this is imo the only thing that is better in CSS and CS:GO compared to 1.6), maps, "WASDAing" and also because of the fact that movement isn't a factor in the game :)
2013-02-24 17:44
actually the player who WASDA's most is getright :) as i said, all maps apart from inferno are similar neither to 1.6 nor to source. mirage is a purely 1.6 map. dust2 was made from scratch, the only similarities it has to source is the direction of gates at long and B plant, lack of boxes at catwalk and lower boxes at T mid and B platform. it also has significant differences from CS:S dust2: the box at short was lowered, which means it can't be used as a cover, which is the reason why CTs so rarely play at short unlike in source; the addition of new camping positions at both plants. the whole map was made from scratch, even the textures are different. de_train is absolutely different to both source and 1.6: the A bombplant was moved; the trains are absolutely different, you can't go under trains; the B trains provide absolutely no cover which makes defending B plant a lot more difficult for both CTs and Ts; in source, it was easy to defend B plant as CT, but a pain in the ass to retake it. in source, there were barrels at alley which basically every CT used to defend alley. however in CS:GO they were removed, so now the way alley is played is very similar to 1.6. oh, and don't forget the new tower. de_nuke is similar to source because it has fast vents and easier to use ceiling beams at A plant. however it has a lot of serious differences, a lot of which of which make it similar to 1.6. for example, just like in 1.6, there's no yellow loader which was an imba position in source. just like in 1.6, there are no sandbags at T platform above the T hut (no idea how it's called in english), which used to make the platform an imba position in source, always making it difficult to push ramp for CTs. the gap at radioroom is much bigger in csgo than in 1.6 or source, which makes pushing ramp even easier. the addition of white barrels at T house, which makes it a lot more difficult for Ts to defend squeeky from CT push. the way outside and lower plant are played in CSGO is absolutely different to both 1.6 and source simply because they moved the backstairs. they also added big barrels instead of boxes at A plant, which makes it different to both CS:S and 1.6. all of these are keyfeatures which make a lot of difference to the map gameplay. as you can see, all maps apart from inferno give no advantage to source players, and 1.6 teams can always veto de_inferno in bo1 if they feel they're bad at it.
2013-02-25 07:44
and as i also said, source teams have to adapt too, as can be clearly seen with verygames, who are nowhere near their source level. in the last 2 years of source the only teams that could challenge VG were RattlesnK's, aNgeldusT's and FeTiSh's teams; the teams that beat them in the last 3 weeks never stood a chance in source.
2013-02-25 07:52
You obviously played 1.6, sucked at it because it takes skill and then you switched to source. I think any source player will tell you its closer to source. They even agree 1.6'ers have better aim and skill. If you took the cs:s players and made them play 1.6, they wouldnt even get past a byoc tournament.
2013-02-24 19:38
lol no i started with source but played some 1.6 with mates for laughs. i've also followed all major 1.6 events simply because i enjoy competition and Counter-Strike in general. i also did a lot of research on differences between 1.6 and source. the "1.6'ers would destroy source players in 1.6" is just ridiculous. both games are about aiming at the head and controlling your spray, if you're good at it then you'll eventually be good at any game which requires that. i've played some 1.6 mixes with 1.6 tops when CSGO started to take over, and guess what, i was doing OK despite having not played 1.6 for over a year. although you're free to tell me which are those crucial differences that require a year to adapt to.
2013-02-25 06:40
You know source and csgo have like 25% bigger models and bigger hitboxes than 1.6? You have to aim at the head in 1.6 and not just shoot chest and spray in source/go. 1.6 was harder for sure. Look at the stats, most of the guys doing high headshot rates are 1.6'ers and watch the frag movies where most of the sick 1 shots are 1.6'ers(ScreaM is the exception because I will admit he has very good aim and movement). I mean if a terrorist and ct met in de_inferno_se A halls, even the biggest noob could just press/hold mouse1 and get a kill against top players.
2013-02-25 07:57
erm, no. 1.6 did indeed have smaller models than CS:S, but that (coupled with the fact that CS:GO has way smaller hitboxes than CS:S ) just makes it easier for 1.6ers to adapt than for source players. it's much easier to adapt to bigger target than to smaller ones. also, i'm not sure why you're saying that 1.6 required aiming to the head. most of the time people just tagged their enemies to the ground and then sprayed them down. Just watch any "Best of 1.6" movie, 90% of rifle frags are made by spraying: . It's actually moments like 3:02 4:13 06:50 that I enjoy, however they were very rare. Also, as you can clearly see from the images above, CS:GO hitboxes aren't made for spraying, the chest hitbox is extremely small... as for headshot rates, you're simply lying. cadred has just published eBot's stats from Vienna LAN. First place is .PhP with 78,08%, second place is ScreaM with 69,7%, third place is ceh9 with 65%, fourth place is drone from CRG with 64,5%, then shoxie with 61,5%, then fl0w from source with 58,8%, then GeT_RiGhT with 58,2%, then spudZ with 57% etc... pretty sure rest of VG would've been up there too if it wasn't for multiple overtimes and third maps (it's easy to make 40 headshots out of 50 frags, much harder to make 160 out of 200).
2013-02-25 09:25
Budy, if the GO models are bigger then 1.6, and the hit box smaller, it makes pretty much the same shit at this point. Yes, 90% of 1.6 frags are by spraying, as you're a former source player and probably sucked at 1.6 (no offense) you don't know how HARD it's to control the 1.6 recoil for spraying, each gun has its way for spraying. while GO is so fucking random. And what b0rat said is completely true, how many times I got killed in GO by a noob who run and shoot and luckly gave a single shot on me (also happens everytime), that's all source features. And for the argument "dust2, train are completely different of source maps".. bitch pls.. look at css/go maps then 1.6 and GO maps.. its MUCH, MUCH similar.. flash similar of 1.6 ?! Have you really played 1.6 ? Its totally source, but weakened. Smoke not similar to source ? Omg...
2013-02-25 14:52
"you don't know how HARD it's to control the 1.6 recoil for spraying" actually it's pretty easy... i actually always enjoyed 1.6 spray simply because of how easy it was. you only needed to hit someone once so that they slow down, then simply drag the crosshair down. there's almost no tagging in source, which meant people could strafe and tap/burst at your head while you had to follow them with your crosshair, instead of simply dragging down your mouse. "while GO is so fucking random." it's not exactly random, it has only one spray pattern unlike source and 1.6, however the kickback is very different from previous versions, which is why it's more difficult to control CS:GO spray. it's not even close to source recoil though, personally I hate CS:GO recoil, i think kickback effect should be more similar to 1.6/source. WASDA was an issue in CS:S however if you were great at tapping/bursting (like scream or shoxie), you'd stand head and shoulders above such players. "its MUCH, MUCH similar.. flash similar of 1.6 ?! Have you really played 1.6 ? Its totally source, but weakened" you don't know what you're talking about... CSS flashes were like 1.6 flashes in everything except afterflash effect. unlike you, i did the research back in the day. you're free to measure it yourself, first throw a flash at your feet and then look at the sky (in order to achieve perfect 180 degrees), then throw it at your feet and look at it. you'll start getting your vision back at equal times in 1.6 and source, however afterflash effect made all the difference: it was pretty weak in 1.6, but source afterflash effect was very strong even if you turned away from the flashbang. CS:GO flashes however are weaker than in both 1.6 and source, you only need to turn like 90 degrees in order to only get a very weak afterflash effect... Not only the afterflash effect is more like 1.6 (although not as long), the duration of full-white effect is less than in both games. exactly what makes CSGO flashes easier for source players to adapt to? "Smoke not similar to source" Smokes used to be absolutely different in source, just watch this: (also notice how extremely similar the map is to dust2 from csgo). It was only updated in late 2010 (1.5 years before people started switching to CSGO), people have been playing with smokes like on that video for 6 years, yet they welcomed the change and quickly adapted to it, while 1.6 players keep making excuses... "look at css/go maps then 1.6 and GO maps.. its MUCH, MUCH similar.. flash similar of 1.6 ?! Have you really played 1.6 ?" they might have source textures (dust2 doesn't even have this), however the gameplay is TOTALLY different. anyone who says de_train is similar to source is retarded. anyone who thinks this is more similar to than to this is an idiot. mirage looks like source because it has source textures, but it isn't a source map. gameplay at de_nuke is absolutely different to source because they moved backstairs, made the squueky door destroyable and removed a lot of overused and imbalanced source positions.
2013-02-25 19:27
Good points well made. But there are too many retards on this site to admit that source players win fair and square sometimes. You can throw as many facts out as you want and they'll simply ignore them and make up their own "facts" such as the GO spray pattern being "so fucking random" when in fact it's the same shot groupings every time if you are standing/crouching still.
2013-02-26 16:25
Actually no. His arguments that the transition from 1.6 to GO and Source to GO are the same is stupid. The fact that he thinks its easy to recoil 1.6 was all I needed to read. The models and physics are completely different. The maps are source style. The skill ceiling of the two games are night and day.
2013-02-26 16:50
from when 1.6 takes skill to play? you can just spray random and kill ..css players can easy adapt to 1.6 but 1.6 players suck at source..confirmed
2013-02-25 09:37
lol, just lol
2013-02-25 14:17
im a css player and i played couple of 1.6 mixes for fun i can tell you at least for me spraying and headshoting from a distance was like easy easy...thats from a css player point of not bashing 1.6 like easy game but thats just me..
2013-02-25 14:40
"Spraying and headshoting from a distance was like easy" You really haven't played a single map of 1.6. 1.6rs sucks at source ? Thats news for me.
2013-02-25 14:55
oh a have and was easy for me do you have a problem with that? Tell me 1 1.6 player that played good css after 1.6 carrier? hmm... Kodiak was the far best player in css he played 1.6 all right but he played css from the begining 2004 and than later he played 1.6 and he said that comming back to 1.6 was far too easy than going to css....problem?
2013-02-25 18:06
Rofl how unhappy you're quoting this: "Come back to 1.6 is far too easy than going to css", That's valid either way. Or you do think a guy who played CSS then moved to 1.6 couldn't do any better by moving back? Look how GuardiaN easily adapt to GO and also can rape majority in css/1.6 (with awp). You'll find "easy" if the game is actually fits with your gamestyle, I liked CSS a bit, so that makes me also like GO (which I found quite better then CSS IMO, but would like to have a better spray, which doesn't need to look like 1.6, but still controlable, and also changes this source walk way).
2013-02-25 19:19
you find it easy if you are skilled player you will be good in any fps just need time addapting...i will take f0rest for example the man can play any game he has some gift for fps games.
2013-02-26 00:12
Yeah right, so trace and friis were soo fucking bad at FPS game (1.6) also neo sucked balls then... Told, that's has nothing to do with it.
2013-02-26 03:10
well that tells me that 1.6 takes less skill than css if you can see css players are almost 80% of them dominating in go ScreaM,Shoxie,Nico,NBK,kennyS,gla1ve,RattlesnK GuardiaN, nad many many point is correct then.
2013-02-26 09:29
problem is tha u fucking brazilians huehuehuehueh come here and tell ppl who played css sucks at 1.6 and u dont even know taht person if ur depressed just kill ur self dont bash other ppl
2013-02-26 12:09
Ow.. The Brazilians are the only ones who flames sources in this forum, right, 4 sure. you should carefully read others comment, looks like your english is not good enough to absorve my point and not even the other who replayed the both guys I replayed telling they're wrong. So do me favor reply them with their country flag name arguing the same shit you did here. Asshead.
2013-02-26 14:48
actually tagging is a big part of advantage considering in 1.6 taking angles plays a much much bigger part than in go.
2013-02-25 07:50
haha u made my day :DDDD after sayin dust2 and flashes not same like in css i stoped reading and start ROFL
2013-02-25 10:11
either you've never played CS:S or you're just braindead. flashes in CS:GO are nowhere near as powerful as in source, you only need to turn 90 degrees from them in order to not get flashed at all, while in source even turning 180 degrees away wouldn't save you from nasty afterflash effect. christ, even 1.6ers know how overpowered source flashes are. not even gonna bother with writing down dust2 differences after that.
2013-02-25 10:27
Poland joeb 
It's a different story :D those three would rock in any FPS game dedicating some of their time
2013-02-24 17:42
first team to switch to cs:go? it is funny that only in moments like these nip gets recognised as a team of 3 1.6 plates... usualy you point out that they have 2 source players and it can't be considered a 1.6 based team. And forest and get_right are geniuses at any fps game :)
2013-02-25 07:24
Have you seen them in any other FPS?
2013-02-25 18:55
have you seen gtr in his fist cs:go game?
2013-02-26 11:56
I saw them in the firsts go4csgo cups and he was pretty shit. I don't think they even won a single one, losing against french subsubtop teams with almost the same roster they have now...
2013-02-26 17:33
i meant europe vs america the firt time gtr touched the game
2013-02-26 17:47
call of duty is based on the quake engine, does that mean its easier for quake players to play? no.
2013-02-24 17:05
:Facepalm: They removed all the Q3 physics in COD. Think before writing
2013-02-24 17:08
And they did the same in csgo...
2013-02-26 17:34
Skybox Nade physics Smoke AWP Movement All taken directly from Source
2013-02-26 18:02
LMAOOO Those things you listed are EXACTLY the ones I would have put in my "not taken from source" list (bar the skyboxes). But hey what do I know, I only played 8fuckin years of css at high level, you probably outknowledge me with your 30mins FFA on this game lmao. Seriously, don't talk about something you don't know at all.
2013-02-26 19:00
so is cs 1.x... :-ss
2013-02-25 07:25
As a spectators,we were able to witness such an epic match in CSGO, and that too in Na'Vi's first LAN tourney. So RESPECT! And Its not always about winning or losing, So please Keep your sad logic to yourself.
2013-02-24 16:44
your logic is funny. they almost beat top2 of the World.
2013-02-24 17:09
how can you still think vg is 2nd? they lost to Anexis HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
2013-02-25 07:47
2013-02-24 16:39
2013-02-24 16:39
Great match, great players, great teams, shitty tournament, shitty admins, shitty organization. All said.
2013-02-24 16:39
shitty csgo..
2013-02-24 16:41
Lol don't have on CS:GO, look what's going on with 1.6, people are starting to like CS:GO and with good reasons. Brick by brick and the game will turn out just perfect.
2013-02-24 16:43
maybe... but now still a shit game
2013-02-24 16:53
you are shitty
2013-02-24 16:43
dat Richtarded Lewis
2013-02-24 16:43
Malaysia yanMY 
they play very OWESOME !!
2013-02-24 16:41
i hope to see NIP versus Navi in futur ! :)
2013-02-24 16:41
Everyone from NaVi have played well at this Lan, i am really Proud to see them running to the Top :). Btw Markeloff is for sure after that Lan the best AWP player in CSGO.
2013-02-24 16:46
yea he was most stable with AWP for sure. i generally think that he didnt do any sick flickshots etc but he was so stable with it and picked most frags!
2013-02-24 16:50
+1 and his clutches was just wow very time and nice to see
2013-02-24 16:58
He just has to hit his shots :)
2013-02-25 15:41
2013-02-24 17:08
Germany Dok1 
Also respect to VG for coming back after their weak start to the tournament. Many people already flamed them and especially ScreaM so it's nice to see that they prove them wrong. Of course also congratz to Na'Vi as they have really impressed me. They will for sure be a team to challenge NiP. I don't get how Na'Vi fans can call their team "noobs" after this tournament.....-.-
2013-02-24 16:46
+1 Haters gonna Hate :).
2013-02-24 16:48
Sorry, they maybe bunch of great people but I have don't have any respect for them. They did the same thing as they did in 1.6 reading tactics and matches for over a month of each and every team. This does not seem go well with me may be I am idiot or whatever (maybe because their same exact stint in 2010 hurt a fnatic a lot and that was fav team in 1.6.
2013-02-24 16:49
That is completely true. And you're not the only one who thinks like that
2013-02-24 16:52
If you are the fan of a Team, In this case Na'Vi, & you witness one hell of a match, then obviously you will have more Respect for that Team.And as a Na'Vi fan, on their first LAN, they were a part of an Epic match. I am not side lining VG too, they are a great team too.
2013-02-24 17:00
Ofc .Navi played so much last months on csgo . They just didnt wanted to show up until they really burnt the game . like on SLTV no one saying about Na vi (they just loose so easily to most of teams)
2013-02-24 17:58
They can't beat a source team ! Shit . What a shame !
2013-02-24 17:01
Its Not always about Winning & Losing, FGS!
2013-02-24 17:04
No. Source sucks forever. Only noobies play source cuz they suck at 1.6.
2013-02-24 17:16
OK OK we got all of you 1.6 players. but let me tell you something cuz i cant just shut my mouth and dont tell anything, because im a person like that.its all about skill and game sense. no matter which cs u playing. for example: you playing 1.6 for 2-3 years, CS:S(new version) comes out, you install it try to play it, after 1 hour u say game sucks. Ok that, because you addapted to 1.6 game style, all your internet friends are playing 1.6, there is still money investigated in that game, why should you switch?. nevermind. i see many of you bitching about 1.6>saucers.But if in year 2004 wasnt money invested in 1.6,all of you would switch to css. and most of you would say after 200hr-300hr of game, wow im doing good(if you had some skill in your previous cs version). same story as now in CSGO, i see many of 1.6 and css guys changed their minds. i played both css and 1.6,so dont need to say anything to me. so i hate it when i read comments and some bunch of unskilled players and kids who have 400 hrs in cs 1.6 saying some random stuff which they didnt experienced at all. for example: u listening to radio, u hear some song of new artist and u like it. This happened to be the new young band ONE DIRECTION. u go to youtube type that song and artist, listen 2-3 times and then read the comments. (THEY ARE GAY,THEY HAVE FEMALE VOICES,THEY SUCK, NEWBIES LIKE JB)and you are disapointed, so that nobody sees that u sucked big cock, and that you was listening to gay music or smth like that, you became a hater. and now everitime when someone posts a link about them (your female's internet FB friends)you need to bitching on that song , because you are an idiot who made mistake and almost got disrespectfull under his internet friends, and escaped to be called gay.What im trying to say that all people from here, 80 % of you are now CS:GO community, there are skilled players from both cs 1.6 and source game, so i dont see any reason to bitching about how 1.6 beats all.And if you cannot addapt to game or have a shit pc, or you are just a kid like this then stop commenting, because it sucks and you are destroying the community (I dont know how i came from CS to ONE DIRECTION but i hope u all understand what im trying to say and understand what my point was,if not i dont give a fuck :)(my english is bad so i couldnt explain it like in my motherlanguage))and i also dont know why im writing this, but i thougt lets give a try to see how many of you have the same mind like me :) bye
2013-02-25 09:49
tl,dr All you guys talking about "lost to a sauce team". But they were not just a sauce shitty team. They were the best CS:SOURCE team of all times, think about it.
2013-02-25 18:28
tbh Anexis wasnt even near to be 'the best CS:Source team', fifflaren and friberg are (and was, back then) nice players, but, in my opinion, not DAT much.. and this VG isnt the same who won 40> tournaments on CSS. and this really care? its a fucking new game, what's the point of being here, talking about two different games who doesn't have tournaments anymore? just play the shitty CS:GO and stfu lol
2013-02-25 19:34
2013-02-25 19:55
You explained everything smartass(it's not sarcasam :D)!
2013-02-26 00:44
i was just being realistic :) thx :D
2013-02-26 16:04
Azerbaijan Talley 
Respect CEH9 He wasn't ghosting today!
2013-02-24 17:01
2013-02-24 17:11
Belarus ALBiNh0 
how did u know?
2013-02-25 15:05
at least he is something. you are just an idiot, talking shit here 24/7
2013-02-26 16:41
Azerbaijan Talley 
I'd rather be someone, not something. And actually I am.
2013-02-26 18:02
10 days at bootcamp and already such an improvement, guess whats gonna happen at CPH Games? Hehe, gg wp Na'Vi!
2013-02-24 17:03
And countless months of anti strating
2013-02-24 17:04
And bullshiting of Foerester. I'm wondering how such a troll like you is still not banned?
2013-02-24 17:05
shit talker
2013-02-24 17:05
After all, you probably still disagree that markeloff is best awper, right? And yeah, anti strating will make Na'Vi win.
2013-02-24 17:06
he is mentally retarded. just ignore him
2013-02-24 17:07
I know that.
2013-02-24 17:08
Best awper for a year in game which was around for ten years? That doesn't make any logical sense unless you started watching CS in 2010
2013-02-24 17:09
Ehm, I hope you're trying to troll because I was talking about CS:GO.
2013-02-24 17:11
Of course he's not
2013-02-24 17:14
Haha, raped your lovely kennyS and still not, cool story bro tell another please.
2013-02-24 17:15
Well I didn't watched the game for more than three rounds because the stream was dead but nice try
2013-02-24 17:17
2013-02-24 17:06
Probably out in groupstage.
2013-02-25 07:48
You Na'Vi hater stop replying me, I don't really give a sh*t about your retarted comments. Just because of people like you, our community is shittiest.
2013-02-25 10:00
2013-02-24 17:05
navi were so amazing
2013-02-24 17:05
gg navi, all played good except Edward, his game dissapointed me
2013-02-24 17:07
fnx | 
Portugal lovessd 
2 months to reach saucers noob lvl not bad in 1 month they will probably rape them.
2013-02-24 17:09
Actually in 10 days.
2013-02-24 17:11
they have played cs:go since december, but nice try. Na'vi will always be nr 5-8.
2013-02-25 10:05
Yeah, and NiP is playing around 1.5 year, nice try. I don't care what number they will be, I wish you will gtfo from this website.
2013-02-25 10:07
1.5 year? they have played since july. i dont know if you are extremly bad at maths or just retarded.
2013-02-25 10:09
rubbe nr 5-8? wtf? Nip fan not aguila,gtfo noob
2013-02-25 13:53
Wrong reply? :)
2013-02-25 14:16
its reply for rubbe :)
2013-02-25 14:18
2013-02-25 19:07
even more
2013-02-25 19:06
lmao, people have been saying that about ESC for ages. still can't do anything to VG, they've also lost to n!faculty at this lan (top3 german team in source) lol.
2013-02-24 17:27
fnx | 
Portugal lovessd 
Navi raped nfaculty i don't care with ESC they ve not been on top on 1.6 for 2 years since neo lost a few his skill they won few lans but that's all not constant performance .Navi was big champions and they d got to VG level really easily and quickly.
2013-02-24 17:34
2013-02-24 17:53
nifaculty were a supershit team in source so there's nothing to be proud of. i do have to admit, markeloff had an amazing lan, but don't get your hopes high. verygames have played dust2 four times at this lan and haven't won once, so them losing to navi at this map isn't really surprising. and mirage is a map that was never played in source, yet they still lost it.
2013-02-25 07:24
If i would play de_season for 6 months 8hrs a day like VG do, I wouldnt care if it was a css map or not...
2013-02-25 15:47
NaVi lost stupid rounds covering the bomb on mirage, they had a lack of luck but they will win next time.
2013-02-24 17:39
+1 hope so.
2013-02-24 17:53
2013-02-24 18:00
NaVi showed us that 1.6 players > source players
2013-02-24 19:02
Here we go again :D
2013-02-24 19:06
They lost :s
2013-02-24 19:50
but they lost is SUPER CLOSE game versus top2 of the World. and they played this game not so long!
2013-02-25 08:17
2013-02-25 08:18
anyway the most important for everyone is that they lost ;( gg
2013-02-24 19:06
1.6 > sAuces players :P
2013-02-24 19:31
go players > go players
2013-02-24 19:33
GTR,f0rest,Xizt,NaVi,ESC > sAuces
2013-02-24 19:41
Dropped on head as child? Everyone knows ketchup > navi...
2013-02-25 10:17
Top 3 teams at Mad Cats = 12 Source players, 3 1.6 players.
2013-02-26 16:31
the match was great but i hate navi so much so im super happy that VG won and hopefully navi never win anything at all in go.
2013-02-24 19:33
now i need a gun so that i can shoot you and then surrender to police.... totally worth it
2013-02-25 14:42
Yes, big respect :)
2013-02-24 19:48
respect to NaVi great match
2013-02-24 19:53
Respect to Navi for an amazing match, it was like the best GO match for nowadays. I hope to see more their games, impressive games, like that. They have potential to be TOP1 again and again.
2013-02-25 08:16
Can't expect NaVi to step up vs two source teams, so 5-8 place finish is really good for a team with their talent :)
2013-02-25 09:27
good job guys
2013-02-25 13:40
congratz navi! u will be top 1-2 for sure!
2013-02-25 13:54
they dont need fake respect they need to win
2013-02-25 14:21
Europe jUN^ 
Na`Vi is capable to beat any team now
2013-02-25 15:12
first lan ? they have a huge advantage over every other team. they have sticked together for ages. same group, only a new game. they have also much more lan experience from theese type of matches than other teams. they have also probably played more csgo the last months than anyone else. Dont think they deserve any special respec cause of this ?
2013-02-25 15:14
more than others? LOL, they are playing since 2010 together
2013-02-25 15:26
esc have been together since 2005(?), ignoring the luq-pasha swap some years back, so that doesn't go for every other team. playing with the same guys year after year isn't necessarily an advantage anyway as some people prefer to refresh their environment.
2013-02-25 15:36
saucer gon sauce.. stinger came from 1.6 and dominated ur shitty scene.if u don't respect na'vi u dont respect cs
2013-02-26 16:48
played very good :P go navi oussamma edward
2013-02-25 15:42
hahaha fck navi
2013-02-25 16:05
NaVi win CPH!!
2013-02-25 18:31
one of the greatest tactics on de_mirage created by na'vi...was in 1.6 tho but the same can be done in GO
2013-02-26 11:32
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.