So beating a noob in 1v1 is a way to prove you understand? What if you lost? It would be the game mechanics fault? Shouldn't you be proving it at a top level? DUH?
I have played 1.6 since 2003, and i have hardly started cs:go as i have university commitments, even thou i would like the time to play cs:go more. So i am unfortunately not like one of your typical British "source" or "go" players. Bad luck
When did i say you are bad? I pointed out GuardiaN is most likely to be more experienced then you , so therefore he is probably right about the game.
You should just re-read your conversation with GuardiaN, because you clearly look irritated with him, because he does not agree with your opinion and i see you have not replied to the other several people who have disagreed with you. Yet you have already lost the argument, so you can only reply with absolute nonsense and rubbish to make you feel that you are still in this argument.
I understand now. Your in High School, a lot of free time, that is why you have devoted so much time, to also try to understand the game mechanics. When i meant priorities. I meant do you have other better things to do then to continue this pointless conversation, instead of replying every part of my reply. Also something that is possibly not counter-strike related? It's okay i was like you once.
An example is your desperation in copying and pasting part of my of reply, and trying to justify that what i was said was incorrect.
Maybe you should learn to accept when you are defeated. I'm out so don't bother writing an essay and copying and pasting pretty much reply and adding a few things like "actually i play sports" , maybe we will engage in another conversation in another thread, i am sure we will, your arrogance is off the roof.