Current state of maps in CS:GO

Philipp "Soodi" Saedler has shared his memoirs of how some maps in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive currently are.

Saedler, who is a community manager at ESL, was one of the guests Valve flew to their Seattle headquarters in order to discuss development and give feedback to the new Counter-Strike sequel.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive will feature new and revised content, pertaining from weapons to maps and so on. While Saedler was in Seattle, he made what he calls a "random list of notes."

In his list he touches on some of the information already reported earlier on, before the game's official announcement, and some of the changes that have been implemented in some of the maps.

de_dust

- New stairs from lower to side; should make splits more common
- Direct connection from sniper to side with a new bridge
- A spot moved to the front of the CT spawn area
- T spawn area up the ramp to make the lower passage more playable

de_aztec

- Sideway down to the water directed to the T spawn now
- Most box and block sizes reduced; added pathways around a lot
- Added fog over the water-pass

de_nuke

- Lower spot
- Underground back entrance
- Vents only open to the spot
- Only the CT door to the window/lab
- Giant boiler on the upper spot; Reducing the open field
- Boxes on the outside have been lowered

de_inferno

- Banana reworked for better defence 
- Sideway at pillars blocked
- Blocking plate at car added
- Connector from 1st to 2nd middle removed
- Multiple boxes and items resized

Obviously, he is used to the maps of Counter-Strike: Source, but his notes should nevertheless give you a hint of what could be to come in the new game.

Saedler points out that the list is not complete, nor necessarily 100% accurate, but is a compilation of what he remembers of the game. Read his full write up and conclusion by clicking here.

imba nuke :))
2011-08-17 05:29
38 replies
More or less not imba.
2011-08-17 05:30
Kevlar and helmet not buyable; automatically added every round Molotov Cocktail: Works well to stop or prevent rushes; Costs 850$ Decoy: Makes gun noises and is shown on the radar; Costs 200$ Taser: Has one shot (drops afterwards), short range, kills on hit; Costs $1000 suuuuuuuuuuucks
2011-08-17 05:37
36 replies
CS:GO is obviously not done for eSports. That's all i can say.
2011-08-17 09:35
14 replies
It's made to attract some kids on pub servers, that's all.
2011-08-17 10:56
9 replies
+1
2011-08-17 12:58
+1
2011-08-17 13:05
+1
2011-08-17 13:47
+1
2011-08-17 15:01
no :) it's made for one purpose only: MONEY !
2011-08-17 15:16
3 replies
why they will need money if cs1.6, css, tf2, L4d & dod are still the best-selling games on steam. valve needs money?! LOL
2011-08-18 01:00
2 replies
Ofcourse they need money. Companies alway's need more money. They exist because of money. And they need money to develope new games. To pay for their people who works for them. And all other stuff that needs to be payed for. Even if a company is insanely wealthy they still gonna want to earn more money. You are pretty naive man.
2011-08-18 09:14
1 reply
+1
2011-08-19 01:42
+1
2011-08-17 20:41
#276
cyx | 
United States NeZiX
Agree. It's done simply to release another game that people will snatch up because of it's name (ala CoD). But, like most people here, I will be picking up the game, playing it, complaining about how shitty it is, and then never playing it again -- much like Counter-Strike: Source.
2011-08-17 16:31
3 replies
:) Yeah well curiosity can be both good and bad. Remember when i was a kid and bought games judging by how the boxart looked. So i bought some fighting game for Gameboy Advance that looked "cool" on the box but when i started playing it..... man that must be one of the worst games i have ever spent my time on.
2011-08-17 18:24
1 reply
imo it's god thing that CS:GO is coming, tbh i've gotten bored of cs 1.6/ CS:S, and cod series because cod comes almost every third month, and i really want to see counter-strike as a littlebit of an diffrent game.
2011-08-17 20:09
but you would have already paid for the game, Valve took your money, enough for them! They don't care if you're going to play it or not, only important stuff is are you going to buy it or not, and obviously, we're all gonna buy it because we MUST know how it is, so we can whine and scream how bad it is :)
2011-08-17 20:39
that was the case before the css pros gave feedback, and we still got the 1.6 pros left. noob
2011-08-17 10:06
5 replies
+1
2011-08-17 11:17
There was a bunch of 1.6 players invited, sorry to say.
2011-08-17 15:32
1 reply
players yes, but not pros. valve have indirectly stated that they'll fly in 1.6 pros as well.
2011-08-17 18:33
just shut up when you have no idea
2011-08-17 16:56
1 reply
i at least know that the game will change. and i think we can both agree that neither of us know much, so stop prejudicing the game even before trying out the beta.
2011-08-17 18:36
.6 FOREVEEEEEEER
2011-08-17 10:39
Nop, if they do this changes, then progamers won't play it cuz the moneysystem will be totally fucked up
2011-08-17 11:09
2 replies
you get used to moneysystem eventually, there are many more other things that are far worse and that will make the game totally unplayable on professional level
2011-08-17 13:30
Pro gamers can play MR7/MR8 or something like that.
2011-08-18 21:11
Maybe this changes (taser, kevlars, defuser etc.) will be added only to CASUAL mode? Its just an alfa version, dont cry.
2011-08-17 13:35
Taser Eco LOL
2011-08-17 13:55
2 replies
rofl
2011-08-17 18:08
made my day.
2011-08-18 01:11
A taser? Really? What kind of a moron came up with that brilliant idea?
2011-08-17 14:46
They are still on debate cuz its pointless to HAVE ANY KEV N HEL if its free.so dont be stupid wiat for the final version
2011-08-17 14:59
1 reply
the grenades are stupid and they will be in the final game, eod.
2011-08-17 16:57
#264
 | 
Netherlands jen5on
Whats the purpose of kevlar/helmet when everyone has it every round?
2011-08-17 15:42
Taser ahahahaha :D:D made my day
2011-08-17 20:18
no more eco rounds... we all know, we<3csONEDOTSIX
2011-08-17 22:10
I dont think that would be a problem. They could just banned those items just like tactical shield on 1.6. A bit disappointed for the kevlar's case though. I'm more concerned about the gameplay which is still leaving a big question mark on us.
2011-08-18 20:27
de_train ONE BOMBSITE ¬¬
2011-08-17 05:30
3 replies
he-he, funny =)
2011-08-17 08:14
WTF???? THAT SUCKS!
2011-08-17 10:39
1 reply
Won't happen. This was the state of the maps BEFORE the discussions in Seattle.
2011-08-17 12:48
"Blocking plate at car added" Ouch...
2011-08-17 05:30
2 replies
afaik there is a car in Source de_inferno on banana
2011-08-17 08:15
1 reply
yeah and all the cars f**king sucks
2011-08-17 12:42
de_dust2?
2011-08-17 05:31
i never play this sucks game =s
2011-08-17 05:32
6 replies
who cares?
2011-08-17 12:32
5 replies
i care
2011-08-17 14:43
2 replies
I doubt that. U only agree with him that this game sucks
2011-08-17 14:54
I do.
2011-08-17 15:29
i think u are pretty baddie playing CS 1.6 So, u only opcion is play CS:GLOBALSHIT HAHAHAHA
2011-08-17 18:06
1 reply
Yes and u r progamer...everyone know u :D. Wow the best player in the world replied to my post :O where is the medal?
2011-08-17 19:31
#8
 | 
Brazil hugoooo
people will use 1.6 remakes instead of these
2011-08-17 05:37
3 replies
Yeah man
2011-08-17 06:12
agree. will you do ones?
2011-08-17 08:14
I dont think so. Because it will be the same and pay for new engine only? It would be fail. New people will play cs:go not 1.6/source players. ,)
2011-08-17 12:35
Take the 1.6 maps. Change nothing but the models. Done.
2011-08-17 05:41
9 replies
+1
2011-08-17 09:42
+1
2011-08-17 10:22
I like the models of 1.6 :(
2011-08-17 10:43
6 replies
lol :)
2011-08-17 12:34
you like not being able to headshot a guy from the back because there're less hitboxes? you like bullets going through enemies' heads?
2011-08-17 13:59
3 replies
some reasons 1.6 is competitive
2011-08-17 14:05
1 reply
hell no...that's probably the only thing what 1.6ers dislike about CS1.6
2011-08-17 14:07
True
2011-08-18 19:49
+1
2011-08-17 15:17
stop covering this, it's clearly a css remake which everybody here hates
2011-08-17 05:41
2 replies
i don't. i embrace this new game, as should everyone else. this IS going to be the new cs. either get on board, or continue to play a dying game that no tournament will host again.
2011-08-17 06:22
1 reply
CSS was a new game too. But people didn't like it, and didn't embrace it. You know what happened? 1.6 didn't die because it was superior game to CSS. And I don't see 1.6 dying to CS:GO as well.
2011-08-17 08:56
WHAAAAAAAAAAAT? de_inferno - Connector from 1st to 2nd middle removed are u serious? :O
2011-08-17 05:42
33 replies
Depends of what connector, there's two connector.
2011-08-17 05:48
32 replies
im cool if it means the "turtle" or "dry river" wtf you call it, but if its the big connector omg
2011-08-17 05:53
26 replies
It's the turtle.
2011-08-17 06:00
1 reply
GOD THANKS
2011-08-17 06:26
we call it mexi pit in the NA scene :P
2011-08-17 06:27
7 replies
oh nice :D
2011-08-17 12:44
2 replies
goschn mex :D
2011-08-18 14:52
1 reply
de haum a posi auf ana cs-map noch mir benannt. oiso du sei amoi gaunz leise :D
2011-08-18 20:43
ROTFL. Wonder why :D
2011-08-17 13:40
2 replies
mexican pit lol dont ask me why been the standard name for a long time now
2011-08-17 15:37
1 reply
I know the irony in that name, no worries ;D
2011-08-17 15:55
we call it fox's pussy in finland
2011-08-17 14:44
We call it 'Vietnam' here in the UK.
2011-08-17 07:48
7 replies
very witty
2011-08-17 08:19
#80
ckN | 
Japan ckN
russians in estonia call it "grob" - coffin in English:D
2011-08-17 09:53
1 reply
we call it "metro" - subway
2011-08-17 13:52
haha in romania it's named "rat"
2011-08-17 11:16
In Denmark it's called the pussy, or the mole.
2011-08-17 11:45
I call it "poop-chute"
2011-08-17 12:45
As do we :)
2011-08-17 18:50
Here in Argentina we call it "biblio"(from library)..
2011-08-17 10:43
6 replies
lol in Portugal we call library to the spot near bombsite A that leads to CT spawn.
2011-08-17 13:04
5 replies
like, right there? imageshack.us/photo/my-images/686/873385.. Here, we call Library too :D (Biblioteca)
2011-08-17 13:41
4 replies
yes, he's aiming at "biblioteca"=library
2011-08-17 13:52
1 reply
someones at finland call it ketunvittu :D ( fox's pussy) ::dd
2011-08-17 14:31
It is libary in SK/CZ(Czech republic, not CS:CZ :D) too. :D
2011-08-17 14:30
yep ;D
2011-08-17 16:12
it's called "grob" in bosnia, translates to "grave" in english
2011-08-17 13:33
It doesn't matter which. Both of them are like children. You don't chose which one to give up, you love them both.
2011-08-17 08:20
4 replies
The small one is useless. Nobody loves it. It's just like that big storage room in nuke near the lower bombsite. It got removed from CSS cause it was fucking waste of space...
2011-08-17 08:59
3 replies
could say the same for cs:s, removed from most international tournaments for being a fucking waste of space
2011-08-17 13:00
2 replies
ROFL :D
2011-08-17 13:54
rofl
2011-08-18 01:12
I worked that that valve headquarters its pretty bad ass in there.!!!
2011-08-17 05:43
shit.
2011-08-17 05:48
1.6 ftw !
2011-08-17 05:50
#19
neeve | 
Portugal neeve
Just create a new game apart of CS 1.6, don't kill it :)
2011-08-17 05:59
1.6 > all counter strikes
2011-08-17 06:03
#22
 | 
Brazil brutAo
CS:GO is not supposed to be "CS2" but a game that's "fun to play" That's the worst quote I could see about CS:GO! hahaha It sounds like a baby game...
2011-08-17 06:03
4 replies
It sounds like COD. No competitive elements at all. Just get in, and shoot those non-recoil guns.
2011-08-17 09:01
3 replies
I hope you're not talking about the first COD:MW :) I played that competitively for several years, and I know for a fact that there are still multiple communities all over the world. But yeah, ever since the first MW the games have been purely public or singleprayer games. (THough I have heard that MW3 will bring back the online competitiveness to the game)
2011-08-17 11:48
2 replies
Cod4 and cod2, the best.
2011-08-17 13:55
1 reply
tru dat ;)
2011-08-18 12:26
What is the purpose to do a redesign of great and well-known maps such as inferno and nuke?
2011-08-17 06:15
1 reply
Classic maps cant be changed, if the want a new version of it, make another one, simply, but not for Valve.I dont know why but they gonna problably ruin the last chance to reunite the community, and i just cant understand that, its just sad.
2011-08-18 00:46
It sucks man ! This fucking Game is a CS:Source Remake .....................
2011-08-17 06:20
can wait for valve to delete cs1.6 in 2012 :))
2011-08-17 06:26
8 replies
#32
 | 
Brazil brutAo
I don't think they will do that otherwise they will have lots of complaints Current Players Peak Today Game 37,746 62,555 Team Fortress 2 15,189 58,146 Counter-Strike 14,608 56,263 Counter-Strike: Source If Team Fortress 2 was not free I believe CS would be the #1 yet...
2011-08-17 06:34
7 replies
he's kidding
2011-08-17 08:22
Where did you found those numbers?
2011-08-17 11:50
2 replies
It's steam's statistic on their page. store.steampowered.com/stats/
2011-08-17 12:34
1 reply
Cool! Thanks bro :-)
2011-08-17 13:20
Yeah, but there're many no-steamers in CS 1.6 unlike CS:Source or TF2 :) In the Balkans for example 90% of the community are no-steamers
2011-08-17 13:54
1 reply
#248
 | 
Brazil brutAo
This turns CS #1 again :) Thanks for remembering me about the non-steam players
2011-08-17 15:01
cs 1.6 is the #1, it just doesn't count the nonsteam players.
2011-08-17 15:34
Cant wait for CS2
2011-08-17 06:28
Delete What ! ....... WTF !! What's the matter with you people ! This CS:GO is CS:Source Remake =s
2011-08-17 06:32
OMG is source remake ! omg noob game = fail ! no one likes it !! its fail ( this is how you guys sound all the time i open this website ) source is a good game, we have our tournaments ofc its not fail has an excellent gameplay in my opinion better than 1.6 in ur 1.6 better (OMG CRAZY CSS IS SHIT ETC ETC) and my comments keep being removed dont know why :S but somehow the admins are proud on a retard acting community. every1 knows 1.6 has great competition, source does also have it but ofc u cant follow it on HLTV.ORG L@L per example youtube.com/watch?v=kR7VGv2yATY a recent international lan inb4 remove comment or guys saying "OMG ARE U RETARD? 1.6 IS BETTER OMG!!! "
2011-08-17 06:41
7 replies
I stopped reading at; source is a good game nice try though
2011-08-17 06:57
2 replies
same here hes clueless
2011-08-17 07:11
God, your IQ is low.
2011-08-18 01:18
Many people where have a close mind, can't see anything after cs1.6... I never play source so i can't say that is good or bad, but this new cs sounds like a new sequel of source, like cz was for 1.6. But in my point of view it's total new game and not a replacement of any kind of existence cs, so after the launch of cs.go cs 1.6 will still exist, like source...
2011-08-17 11:18
Even some pro CSS'ers say CSS needs to be fixed. (theres a thread at steam forums, cbf searching it)
2011-08-17 13:06
I am sorry man, but I hate this recoil. U can make a fullout with AK, and just pull the crosshair down then we have got 5 hs. I think its low. :/ But what I like in CSS, is the easy fz.
2011-08-17 14:47
1 reply
ok when u do that pm me plz. btw u can do awp jump shots on cod but i dont see u in fnatic.cod or something like that ;) fucking retards
2011-08-17 21:54
GO is turning out to be shit
2011-08-17 06:45
I see. This shit will be just like CSPROMOD, nobody will play that much.
2011-08-17 06:55
#38
 | 
Denmark Saiya_7
why are people exicted about this game?! this is just source 2, and we all know source sucks big time :)
2011-08-17 07:06
To make it really short, I hope this fails as CSPROMOD did.
2011-08-17 07:09
Hey valve, next time don't copy the 1.6 maps and fuck everything up. Yes you did it with source, you made it worse. People might argue with me that source isn't meant to be a 1.6 copy but c'mon.. They copy the weapons,maps,sort of same gameplay. How the f* else are we suppose to compare it with? "Yeah we stole ideas from 1.6" Get bent. WHY is it so hard making a updated 1.6? Instead you come and screw with everything else that's not even related to what made CS it is today. You made the gameplay more 'simple' in source, there are no 'headshot' feeling, the person you just shot in the head just die like he got a instant boner or something. The recoil? Don't get me started, it's more like fantasy world recoil, it's not even funny. It feels like you <vALVE> have abandoned the 1.6 community, you don't listen nor do you care? Why should we leave our fav game when you just mess everything up? You edit the map (they are not the same), you remove the 1.6 feeling of the recoil, you remove the 'headshot' feeling from 1.6, you remove purpose of the 'flash', you remove wallbanging, you remove throwing the granade as it should be. Congrats you have now splitted the community from <CS 1.6 | source>. Why did you even call source counter-strike sigh...
2011-08-17 07:18
7 replies
+1
2011-08-17 07:34
3 replies
+1
2011-08-17 08:07
2 replies
+1
2011-08-17 10:39
1 reply
+1
2011-08-18 00:55
If source was not supposed to copy cs then why is it called cs source?
2011-08-17 07:48
That compares to the largest amount of drivel I've seen on these forums
2011-08-17 12:39
LMAO
2011-08-17 13:03
It will fail as CSP. :)
2011-08-17 07:20
agree dust1 and aztec needed to be balanced but nuke and inferno? REALLY?
2011-08-17 07:34
1 reply
I agree!! Nuke and inferno are really balanced IMO and don't need to be changed one bit!
2011-08-17 07:45
facepalm :/
2011-08-17 07:46
Maps really dont bother me as long as there are still decent map makers out there to make a new version of the maps. What we need to worry about is the money system,the dmg of guns (because valve wants all guns to be viable now), the movements, and the hitboxes and recoil. Obviously that is a pretty big list, but maps should not be a reason people do not play this game. It obviously is going to be a re polished version of source on the portal2 engine but that does not mean its a bad thing. Lets seriously face the music here, 1.6 is not going to last forever, sooner than later there will be less and less prize money, less tournaments, and less sponsors to keep the scene going. We can not continue to be this thickheaded, I agree that the game has to be playable before we make the switch, but it seems like alot of people are already signing it off as failure. There are some really nice features so far as far as matchmaking, I really think that this is a really nice feature. Its easy to find mixes when your team mates are not on, and it will be alot simpler for finding clan battles. The new addition of weapons, 1 defuse kit and the auto armor is pretty useless, and the money system is broken, but the game is in the beginning stages of its Alpha. Lets be hopeful about this, it may eventually turn out to play and feel like 1.6 with dramatically updated graphics. I cant speak for everyone, but when steam came out I was very against it. Playing the beta made me want to quit playing counter strike, the addition of 2 new weapons, a riot shield, new menus, I did not want anything to do with it, but things turned out good after I gave it a chance.
2011-08-17 07:46
2 replies
thanks for posting a logical and thought out point. Pisses me off to no end to see people like. "Omg source remake sucks." Before they even played it. Remember when value made source they DIDN'T listen to the fans, they completely ignored us. Their new approach is totally different and its like what blizzard did with sc2. Sure you'll always have people who still cling to bw or 1.6 for example. But it could potentially be big game that is fun and challenging. It could also bring in a lot of money back into the game. Sponsors are gonna give up on 1.6 at one point or another. We should all be hoping that CS:Go is actually a good game and try not to bash it before its even released without giving it a shot.
2011-08-17 09:37
1 reply
Yeah it pisses me off too , people don't understand that this is a different game that is not created to replace 1.6 or source. "source remake source maps sucks" "only css players were there and now the maps suck" these maps etc were made by valve not the css players and again its a NEW game not a game that is supposed to be 1.6 with better graphics. Yes I agree that this game could potentially go huge if they fix the recoil that's my only concern.
2011-08-17 10:18
who cares if it will be a look like cs:s
2011-08-17 08:04
Everything, that needs cs 1.6 is better graphics.
2011-08-17 08:31
Imo this game will be epic fail. -.-
2011-08-17 08:39
Give it a fking try when it comes out u fking cheap guys, how can u judge the game that isnt out yet and will be worked on for many many hours
2011-08-17 08:52
CS:GO has CS:S weapons, CS:S maps, Joe said it looks brilliant, So what's side of CS:GO looks similar to 1.6? Gameplay? We'll see.
2011-08-17 09:05
sounds like stupid shit
2011-08-17 09:15
Photo ?
2011-08-17 09:39
By the way are alpha and beta of CS:GO called CS:READY and CS:STEADY respectively?
2011-08-17 09:42
Fake
2011-08-17 09:44
would you guys realize that valve only wants soruce? this is cs:s but with better performances...the maps are like source gameplay is like source movement EVERYTHING
2011-08-17 09:51
14 replies
Valve only wants Source, thats a new one? Where do you people get this absolute dribble from?
2011-08-17 12:43
11 replies
Go back to Cadred and take your source fags with you
2011-08-17 12:53
10 replies
lol somebody cannot handle the truth :)
2011-08-17 13:05
9 replies
What truth, please explain to me in more detail.
2011-08-17 13:11
8 replies
oh dear lord.... i am not wasting my time.
2011-08-17 13:15
7 replies
I was just telling you to fuck off to Cadred, in no context to anything. So when you said, "somebody cannot handle the truth *gay smiley face*" I was confused, because i pay no attention to what someone from cadred writes, because its complete shitbollocks. catchmydrift, Gumpster?
2011-08-17 13:18
6 replies
Yet it's been people on this site that say there is a freedom of choice. So no I wont "fuck off to Cadred".
2011-08-17 13:29
3 replies
FODDER V2?
2011-08-17 13:35
Why is it that the people who support Source are 98% of the time from UK or USA? Couldn't hang with the rest of us in 1.6 so you gave up and moved on to the kiddy-friendly version, and now you're feeling a bit insecure about your choice so you need to convince yourself that you are, in fact, having tons of fun playing the inferior version of the game, even though there's this nagging feeling at the back of your head that something's amiss?
2011-08-17 14:51
1 reply
So the other 2% makes up Germany, France, Netherlands, Portugal, Italy, Denmark and various other scenes? My god. You are unbelievable. "Couldn't hang with the rest of us in 1.6 so gave up and moved on to the kiddy-friendly version" Nothing to do with that. I was never any good in 1.6 and I am not good in Source, I couldn't care less. I actually enjoy playing Source, I enjoy watching Source & 1.6, as I enjoy watching TF2. Does that make me less of a gamer, not really. I enjoy any of the competitive scenes, TF2 has one of the best "communities" out there, because they are all quite friendly, unlike the CS scene (both 1.6 and Source) are filled with elitist people, who like to start troll wars like this. However that doesn't deter me from the CS Series, and I am excited for the new game. You seem like another closed minded gamer, with a loud voice about how 1.6 is the perfect game, and nothing else comes close etc... blah blah blah.
2011-08-18 00:13
dawg it doenst mean if u love hltv other sites are shit and they are writing ''bollocks''. Show some respect..
2011-08-18 10:33
1 reply
Urm, do you even know what Cadred is and how they beef with CS without any freakin' need all the time? I have no problem with other sites, except that. So, really, I have no clue, what you're talking about.
2011-08-18 10:42
how do you know this? are you working @ valve hq or something? No videos yet, the game is in Alpha stages, theres no SS yet and somehow you are full of information from the inside
2011-08-18 02:05
1 reply
haha there are SOOOOO many web sites that you can go to check just try harder to find..and this may sounds INSANE but i have some inside infos ;)
2011-08-18 10:32
train , tuscan , dust2 gl hf
2011-08-17 09:52
#81
m1hka | 
Russia m1hka
"Blocking plate at car added" Source :/ "Connector from 1st to 2nd middle removed" OMG minus balance...
2011-08-17 09:54
3 replies
OMG how often do u use connector in-game?
2011-08-17 14:49
2 replies
You know very often.
2011-08-17 17:16
I don't agree with the minus balance, as it can be compensated. But I do have to disagree with you, as many tactics pass by smoking 1st middle and rotating trough that sand tunel to avoy peeping toms in middle, when needed, since smokes help your hiding.
2011-08-18 01:32
prize for CS:GO :D?
2011-08-17 09:59
don't worry guys. this shit won't leave any impact to cs 1.6 ; like nobody can do the same for Chuck. The Norris.
2011-08-17 10:02
5 replies
if pros leave 1.6, i'd like to see how many would still playing this
2011-08-17 10:40
4 replies
If the game is accepted by the sponsors, they have to go to CS:GO =/...
2011-08-17 10:49
3 replies
When source comes out, fnatic still fnatic, sk still sk... i don't see any kind of sense in your comment...
2011-08-17 11:24
no, who would sponsor cs:go in category of proffesional gaming if there will be small amount of teams and little prizes? there must be pro community to go there for sponsors, they need just an advertisment and potential clients (in these guys who will watch hltv etc.)
2011-08-17 11:29
No they have to go when pros accepted this game.
2011-08-17 12:16
I still don't understand why you guys rage over source so much and call for valve to make 1.6 look better. Valve abandoned us back in 2004. and never looked back. 1.6 is valves dumpster baby. When I read someone from source community say "HEY, VALVE WON'T BE UPDATING 1.6 EVER AGAIN, DEAL WITH IT", well NO SHIT CAPTAIN OBVIOUS.
2011-08-17 10:09
They did a remake on Source maps not on cs 1.6 ... FUUUUUU THAT!
2011-08-17 10:23
looks nice!
2011-08-17 10:27
waiting for Phaser and teleport :X
2011-08-17 10:29
2 replies
Enegerize!
2011-08-18 02:28
1 reply
Than captain to the bridge! :)
2011-08-18 10:20
aztec O_o
2011-08-17 10:37
Screenshots will be coming out next week.” “The first keys will be given out at Pax or the Eurogamer Expo. We will open it up to more people later.” Is it ture?
2011-08-17 10:37
another shit game will be :( too sad,wtf why do they added molotov coctails ? :DDDD
2011-08-17 10:40
they are hurrying with the game, that's good, so it will be exactly like source, but with changed models/maps. GOOD!
2011-08-17 10:42
well, without any videos or photos it looks like big bad joke. bad cs:go! bad Newell!
2011-08-17 10:42
#101
 | 
Greece her-1g
take it easy it wont replace 1.6 jesus........how old are you all 13?now we will have 3 counter-strike games noone replaces noone..obviously valve knows that 1.6 community wont switch to another game after 8 years of cs 1.6 the same goes for source players..they made a nice game for consoles and pc for everyone to play it for fun..end of story
2011-08-17 10:43
8 replies
agree on that :D
2011-08-17 10:46
sure.but on the other hand, most 1.6 players (including top) think that 1.6 as a game is too old, with a lot of bugs.Forthemore,young players are not interested in a game with LOTS-OF-PIXELS instead of graphics engine. BUT! Valve isn't a company,which makes products depending on players opinion. They are interested to earn some cash on 1.6 fans.Again.Like it was with CZ;CZ:Deleted Scenes;Source;CS:Online and others. Inviting 1.6 players for beta-test - just another kind of advertisment. ps sorry 4 eng,i'm russian badass :D pps peace guys :D
2011-08-17 11:07
6 replies
#117
 | 
Greece her-1g
if they really want to upgrade 1.6 then they should buy all the CS PRO MOD rights apply the portal2source engine on it to make the graphics better and release it..we have a half finished counter-strike game which actually has the potential to be big and we dont get advantage of it...
2011-08-17 11:12
5 replies
agree with that. if they want to - thay'd do that earlier.
2011-08-17 11:16
They wont do that lol, thats just a pipe dream. How about we wait for this new version to be released and then be the judge of it.
2011-08-18 02:09
3 replies
#365
 | 
Greece her-1g
unless you wanna play something between source and 1.6 with molotov no bunny hoping ..they will release this game to hit cod on consoles in america mostly thats the reason behind that..1.6 community is a big industry with media players contracts sponsors thousands euros tournamets every year and millions of fans this wont change in a night to another game..cs pro mod is the best solution as its the same game with 1.6 only with polished graphics :)
2011-08-18 10:55
2 replies
No I dont want to play what you explained, but its still only in the alpha stages. I really like the idea of MMR which will make it easier to play mixes when you dont have a team and better to find suitable opponents based on your teams MMR. I obviously dont want to play a game that plays exactly like source. If this new game has a good netcode, and good recoil patterns, with similar movement to 1.6 I would be very happy, but again we will have to wait til the betas or release to find that out. The new weapons dont bother me, they will be banned in league play just like the riot shield, the maps dont bother me because there will be new maps for league play(remakes of the originals with polished graphics) I am going to wait and see what the future brings :)
2011-08-19 00:44
1 reply
#385
 | 
Greece her-1g
"If this new game has a good netcode, and good recoil patterns, with similar movement to 1.6 I would be very happy, but again we will have to wait til the betas or release to find that out" it wont
2011-08-19 01:33
When do they release it?
2011-08-17 11:07
1 reply
2012. coincidence? :D
2011-08-17 11:10
proposition for valve: add grenade launchers, helicopters, tanks and claymores, it will make this game just more stupid
2011-08-17 11:30
Connector first to second mid removed? Whatthehell...
2011-08-17 11:36
This is source 2.0.........
2011-08-17 11:50
#131
 | 
Russia Voka2H
de_inferno - Connector from 1st to 2nd middle removed Epic fail...
2011-08-17 11:51
1 reply
+1
2011-08-17 13:05
relax guys, they were going to feature both a noobfriendly mode in the game and an E-sports mode, + they are still going to have 1.6 pro's test it and listen to their input. Let's not judge just yet ^^ Although I will admit the inferno comment is kind of alarming, no connector? take out chokepoints on a map that already has a bombsite which is too easy to defend because it is so close to CT spawn and has only 1 main chokepoint? odd
2011-08-17 11:57
2 replies
Liquiddddddddddd dont worry about the maps, we can get new maps at any time after the release. Lets just hope it does not play like source. Cheers!
2011-08-18 02:11
1 reply
hehe yeah I hope it has the looks of source, but not the feeling (movement+wallbangs should at least be more like 1.6, and less rubbish on the floor, like moving tons etc.)
2011-08-18 09:52
no offence, CS:GO is for angry kids from pub.
2011-08-17 12:01
10 replies
So that suits the majority of people on here ;)
2011-08-17 12:45
9 replies
Nah, this suits all your Source queers with your non recoil shitty game, so yeah, it's rather for you lot.
2011-08-17 12:56
8 replies
Not really, as you dont know what you are on about. This suits the haters on here....
2011-08-17 13:01
7 replies
I rather do know what I'm on about, you're angry because we're already not very fund of CS: GO. So when ever some one hates on it you go to your little basement and cut yourself. THEY DONT LIEK IT, OMG, ITS GONNA BE LAIK SOURCE, NOBODYZ GON PLAY IT :(((((( amirite? Gumpster?
2011-08-17 13:15
6 replies
Denied. I am actually pleased that a gamer has made up his mind about a game he has never even played before, as it shows one point very true. That gamer has a very narrow approached and naive way of life in the real world. Why would I be pleased, because I am not that gamer. And please tell me how you know what you are on about when it comes to Source, have you played it at a top level, have you even played it at a competitive level, or even a low level for 5 - 6 years. So no, I am not "cutting myself" in my basement just because you hate on a game I have never even played yet. But infact you will find it's the other way round. If someone says anything slightly even minute against 1.6 the 1.6 players go into overdrive and defend their game to oblivion and back. So no you cannot handle the truth, no you do not know what you are on about, and to be honest you should get out of your own little basement a little bit here, and actually embrace things with an "open mind".
2011-08-17 13:28
5 replies
Exterminator. You can have an opinion about a game before it's even released with the information given from the developers. So no, you're not really narrow minded, because you have facts to base on your statement. Molotov cocktails, Tazers, modified gameplay for the console, the list goes on. In fact, you'd be narrow minded if you didn't see anything wrong here. No, no one has made their minds up until they have played it obviously, thats just plain fuckin retarded.
2011-08-17 13:33
4 replies
lol... you can have an opinion yes, but saying some of the shit on here is unbelievable, like "Valve are ruining CS" and various others points.
2011-08-17 13:35
3 replies
haha, but they are ruining CS if they are releasing shittier versions after each other. They need to fix source, or some shit
2011-08-17 13:39
2 replies
How are they "ruining CS"? How do you know if the game is "shit" if you haven't even played it yet. Some of the "features" that have been put into the game, may actually make it better and for the good. Or do people around here not want to "evolve"? If they were "ruining CS" they wouldn't even bother making a new game for a new community of people who could actually appreciate "CS" for what it is. Some of you hate Valve, and it is well unjustified... They are "fixing" bugs that occur in Source, they are also updating it to make it look and feel a bit more how Source players want it to feel, ie like 1.6. We all play the same franchise, I just dont get the hate that some people dish out here. It is unreal and unheard of.
2011-08-17 13:53
realy?! replying to a troll? dont waste ur time...
2011-08-18 01:15
spoiling the game, are ruining this game whit to many changes, leave the game as it was. Don´t change this great game!!!
2011-08-17 12:03
I really hope this crappy game doesn't kill 1.6 :(
2011-08-17 12:03
cs 1.6 was and always will be the most played game, even if the valve make any new games cs 1.6 is always higher than. I hope...
2011-08-17 12:08
Waiting for them to add the portal gun... Just imagine a decoy thrown throuh a portal or portaling a flashed enemy to the other bombsite - that would be great, wouldn't it?
2011-08-17 12:18
de_inferno - Connector from 1st to 2nd middle removed so many aces there :D
2011-08-17 12:11
another fail game
2011-08-17 12:22
Where's dd2?
2011-08-17 12:34
we need new weapons
2011-08-17 12:43
5 replies
what? bazooka and molotov cocktail :D
2011-08-17 12:52
1 reply
new weapons :S
2011-08-18 01:03
Nuclear Bomb - 16k
2011-08-17 14:02
I'd like to see TAR-21(Tavor) in this game :D
2011-08-17 15:02
noobtube, chopper gunners and a nuke like cod would be sweet like hell :D
2011-08-18 01:20
this is horrible ...
2011-08-17 13:01
1.6 forever
2011-08-17 13:02
imo, current valve sucks at making competitive games. cs:s? tf2 was okay, but still needed some balancing & fixes. instead it got hats. l4d is pretty much reliant on the mods to make it a viable competitive game.
2011-08-17 13:03
5 replies
but, as casual & fun games go, they've hit the spot with almost every game released. tf2, l4d1/2, portal1/2 & the HLseries are pretty fun.
2011-08-17 13:05
Yet Valve have made some of the most popular games out there in the world. Aside from COD on console, and WoW/SC2, then Valve are up there with the rest. Go figure :P
2011-08-17 13:12
3 replies
Valve more often then not didn't make them... They contracted someone else to or continued on another game Team Fortress? Came from Quake Counterstrike? Came from some modders Portal? See Narbacular Drop
2011-08-17 14:19
2 replies
About portal, they saw some students sowing a tech demo on the source engine (if i'm not mistaken) which was about portals and the physics related to it, they liked what they saw and hired that group of students.
2011-08-17 15:19
1 reply
Portal came from Narbacular Drop. Pretty well documented as well. It was made by the group of students I think you're thinking of youtube.com/watch?v=acs3NLXWphQ
2011-08-17 15:23
This will be the best game in the world!! not...
2011-08-17 13:08
the 1.6 players won`t jump to CS:GO.. maybe the CS:S n00bs will do so because that is the kid-game of CS:S AND NOT 1.6
2011-08-17 13:08
God the amount of 1.6 fanboys is amazing.
2011-08-17 13:11
I dont understand ONE thing, one fucking thing..really. Why the fuck they dont make SAME game like cs1.6, with same recoil and all that stuff + source graphic or smth better from this HL engine(for those source players and "new school" gamers, or better for their satisfaction), and they will earn money more then with any pathetic try to make game similiar to source or dont know what game. Why would anyone add some changes on maps or weapons or any single shit ? Go play Call of Duty then..Battlefield BC3 is coming out, we dont need something like that here. Counter Strike WAS unique because it's simple and again, so random and advanced in so many ways. Dont understand those stupid minds in Valve or whatever.. I have a feeling that their task is to kill CS1.6 scene, not to earn money.
2011-08-17 13:12
8 replies
Yes they sit in their offices every day thinking of a new way to kill 1.6 ROFL.
2011-08-17 13:13
7 replies
One more smartass. Hello.
2011-08-17 13:15
5 replies
"Dont understand those stupid minds in Valve or whatever.. I have a feeling that their task is to kill CS1.6 scene, not to earn money." lol ironic you call me the smart ass.
2011-08-17 13:16
4 replies
That is called a feeling. Why the hell you even commented on that ? You know something which i dont ? Go look for your stuff. Thanks.
2011-08-17 13:17
3 replies
look for my stuff? That is called a feeling, so you are saying that you have a feeling that Valve are "out to get you", and kill 1.6 dead. Perhaps the feeling of, "they are experimenting with a new formula to CS, and it could be a good thing here, as it may make things better in the long run", would be a better feeling. More people knowing about CS, the better and bigger it may grow.
2011-08-17 13:24
2 replies
Can't help you with your feelings. Thanks for sharing yours. Bye.
2011-08-17 14:10
1 reply
Business and "feelings" dont mix that well, face it, we are the MINORITY, all we can do is hope for a decent game that can be improved over time.
2011-08-18 02:13
:DDDDD ye +1
2011-08-17 13:21
SO many retards on this site... none of you have ever played source, or atleast not enough to judge the game. Many people in source know that 1.6 is a better game - but they dont really want to play tetris. Get out your own arses about you game, its not the only game and its slowly dying. in conclusion you're all fucking idiots
2011-08-17 13:14
26 replies
u r 99% right. but 1% not. 1.6 is not dying:)
2011-08-17 13:47
20 replies
im 99.9% sure its dying.
2011-08-17 13:51
19 replies
I 100% know source will dissapear or loose all its players before 1.6 even starts declining :D
2011-08-17 15:05
18 replies
wow what world are you living in? oh yeah the 3rd...
2011-08-17 16:16
17 replies
ok mr.shaney, what are you really trying to s ay. you think this is kindergarden? I can help you find it if you want, crawl back to the site called cadred and stay there until you mature enough and able to take care of yourself. Doesent matter what world You live in, like this, you will allways be the looser and the child, with the attitude of a neandertal i would be surprized if you ever get a job. It doesent matter if I live in the moon, 1.6 will be the best game up there as well. Just leave dude or continue getting embarrased, if you want to bend over once again, just come back with a reply, i will wake up my dingdong for you. mwanwhile gtfo!
2011-08-17 16:35
16 replies
Nope, you are all like "OMG 1.6 FOREVER ITS THE BEST GAME AFNDHTJTSAAK*&^%*^%%$^" when its 12 years old, when are you gonna realise that it is slowly dying? im not here to rant and be offensive to anyone here... but im reading down these comments seeing thigs like "1.6 will never die", "its the only Counter Strike". These people have names like "<3 f0rest" or "Natus Vincere fan club" (well they actually have a fan club where everyone can see that they just want to brown nose). CS:Source isnt perfect, everybody knows this, but the updates that are meant to be implicated over the next few months will make the game feel more like 1.6 - which in theory should please your self obsessed community? If we want a CS label in the E-Sports industry then surely we need to unite rather than being one side that is slowly dying (1.6) - dont deny its not dying, when IEM are supposedly dropping it soon and picking up source. And soon i feel many more changes will happen to tournaments regarding 1.6. Players like f0rest and anyone at the very top of the game have been there for as long as i remember, soon they will feel that there time is up and move on to real life roles - ie familys or whatever. When that happens there are no intake of new players for 1.6. In source we do have a lot of the old school players still at the top, but we also could have the new intake of players... Just think how great the whole counter strike would be if everyone united... but you lot wont because you stand by your 12 year old game like its a religion (this may not have made sense but wanted to waste as little time as possible reply to someone called "bitf")
2011-08-17 16:58
15 replies
What updates? Source updates?
2011-08-17 18:26
13 replies
source is having updates cadred.org/News/Article/154829/
2011-08-17 19:19
12 replies
cadred? let me see... another unprofessional and not official topic?
2011-08-18 01:27
11 replies
yes because everything Cadred does is "unprofessional" and not official. lol.
2011-08-18 10:53
5 replies
didnt said that. And 1 article, yes, can make a bad reputation for a org.
2011-08-18 19:47
4 replies
Just because you cant be bothered to read the article properly doesn't mean Cadred is "unprofessional".
2011-08-18 22:41
3 replies
Ok troll, im at the best university of latin America, USP, just for coincidence, ofc i cant read "properly".
2011-08-18 23:07
2 replies
You obviously cannot read properly, please re-read my statement because "cant be bothered to read the article properly" does not equate to "cant read properly". And bringing in your education and what you do doesn't bother me either.
2011-08-19 13:48
1 reply
I should just read and interpretate literary what u write? What a waste of time... damm. Hint: quotation marks have a meaning
2011-08-20 05:19
Why would it be false? how is it unprofessional? Stop being sour
2011-08-18 11:16
4 replies
Not saying its false, but that article about 1.6 makes doubtable the unprofessionalism of the site, making me hard to believe what they write at it until its OFFICIAL. thats all what i mean and its my opinion ofc
2011-08-18 20:13
3 replies
It was his opinon and last time I checked everyone was entitled to them, he pointed out a few things about how stubborn the 1.6 community is, and has so far proved his point completely.
2011-08-19 13:49
2 replies
1. I wasnt talking to u 2. Show me how he proved his point COMPLETELY
2011-08-20 04:50
1 reply
The # of threads it caused, the amount of stupid comments defending 1.6, the storm it caused in general... That evidence is all on this site.
2011-08-21 03:34
When Source is upto our standards, then sure, we will move on and 'unite'. Until then, we'll rather stay with our 12 year old dying game. Atleast, I speak for my self. So yeah, I do hope Valve works some wonders on source. I'd rather keep playing a truly great game until it dies. Many 1.6ers will move on to source when 1.6 dies, but many many others will just quit, and I'll be one of them.
2011-08-18 11:27
I played source (even after updates), and its shitty. GeT_RiGhT played source, and said its shitty. Who are you again? I hope you are not mad because you chose to waste your life in a failed game no one cares about. BTW, I see you later (and lots of other source idiots) in HLTV this weekend, spectating the glory of 1.6 hahaha! Do we spectate source matches? NOT So humiliating for source player haha! Have a good day!
2011-08-17 13:58
4 replies
+1
2011-08-17 15:26
read my reply above
2011-08-17 17:40
where did get_right state that he played source and its bad? give me some proof.
2011-08-17 18:43
1 reply
i would also like to know this
2011-08-17 19:31
: S what a shit , we need a final version of cs promod
2011-08-17 13:15
If its build on source engine or modified source engine then its definitely gonna suck, aint it?
2011-08-17 13:30
5 replies
yes it must be shit cause its built on a more up-to-date engine...
2011-08-17 13:45
1 reply
+1
2011-08-18 02:13
Its build on Portal engine :/
2011-08-17 19:03
2 replies
and why is that a bad thing? Try to understand that sooner or later 1.6 will not have a sponsored competitive scene with an ancient game. It really does not matter what we think, at the end of the day, money makes the scene go round.
2011-08-18 02:14
1 reply
I didn't said its bad :o
2011-08-18 10:52
I don't really know if I like this..
2011-08-17 13:35
seems like team fortress 2
2011-08-17 13:49
this sucks :(
2011-08-17 13:57
My face when they tried to make the aztec map competitive img.chan4chan.com/img/2010-05-12/1273645..
2011-08-17 14:02
nice improvements on aztec and dust, hope they will also improve as_oilrig and cs_assault and invite some pro ricochet players and besides fake noise grenades they should also add grenades that instantly spawn tanks and helicopters
2011-08-17 14:03
1 reply
Maybe they could also add a grenade that spawns new teammates, about 10 of them to be more accurate.
2011-08-17 18:25
CS : GO needs 1.6
2011-08-17 14:17
this seems like CS:S-2 tbh
2011-08-17 14:18
not so good :(
2011-08-17 14:27
2 replies
who asks you :p
2011-08-17 14:30
1 reply
kid,no trolling
2011-08-18 10:00
CS:GO D!E 1.6 f0rever!!
2011-08-17 14:33
1 reply
+1
2011-08-17 15:41
I guess we have to give it a try.. but i have to say i dont really like what i've read about this game. feels more like css and that game suuuuuucked. 1.6<3
2011-08-17 15:00
Making a game and change the name is already a huge mistake. It sounds like a miss trust to the outcome of the result. Valve is extremely afraid of changing 1.6, so afraid that they cant even change the graphic and keep the same gameplay feeling. How about making a fake flashgrenade for about 500$, maximum one per player? That does not make you white but instead, when it bangs it will burst into a little small red smoke, that disappears after a while? It is certainly a fucking joke with a radio-grenade that will be seen on your radar. and that in my opinion not will be to authentic for the players to count as real, players will wonder... why is that moron shooting here all the time? It will fool you in the beginning, YES... but after a while? NO. A grenade that otherwise make you white or sets a red smoke? Impossible. Haha a Tazer, have you ever seen elite-soliders in any documentary or article attack a place with a fucking tazer, that kills instantly? This game is about SAS, SPETZNAZ, AL-QAIDA, ETA and IRA. Not fucking tv-show about COPS chasing a drunk redneck. Of course i understand that this game is not realistic, but the main idea and story should be... but in the same way it should keep the arcade feeling. And what about this crap of remaking good, competitive maps? Players around the world has already made a choice of choosing the maps, witch does not include aztec and dust in tournaments... why? they are not balanced, but Train, dust2, nuke and inferno is. So please dont fucking destroy the maps that are good for tournaments and remake instead those maps witch players has already dismissed, for many years, for much better competitive playing. Fuck you Global Offensive
2011-08-17 15:01
9 replies
+1
2011-08-17 15:48
Wtf have I just read.... oh wait a load of useless dribble.
2011-08-18 00:17
6 replies
dont reply to him then ?! and dont think to press this reply button,oh yeah.. ur a troll .. u will press it.. keep going fucking kid u gonna be famous :D
2011-08-18 01:38
3 replies
Why would I wanna be famous... idiot.
2011-08-18 01:50
2 replies
point proven
2011-08-18 03:14
1 reply
lol :) cool
2011-08-18 03:31
Man, I have no clue what you're doing in HLTV.org. If you read a load of dribble all the time, leave our forums, its fucking simple. You're seriously getting on my nerves.
2011-08-18 11:14
1 reply
:P
2011-08-19 13:48
If this game were embraced after launch, those small flaws of new items would banned from league play either way
2011-08-18 02:17
nice,but cs 1.6 is cs 1.6 :))
2011-08-17 15:06
I see there a lot of shit about Molotov, Decoy grenade and Taser but Dont forget that There is a shield in CS1.6 and Nightvision but its prohibited at tournaments. And I think that Molotov and other features will be prohibited, too. Maybe It will be available only in casual mode. Peace :D
2011-08-17 15:08
It sucks... Source engine is the worst thing that happened in the world history.
2011-08-17 15:47
45,988 59,688 Team Fortress 2 45,497 55,971 Counter-Strike 2,562 2,826 CS: GO
2011-08-17 15:49
The best option would be to wait for the beta version to be released and then have an opinion , rather than simply criticizing something u haven't played . Leave alone played , not even seen any snap of it. PEACE !
2011-08-17 15:55
lol war3mod > CS:GO valve add tanks, airstrikes, camouflage clothes, radars, and stop raping the classic maps pls
2011-08-17 15:56
Better would be new maps Than destroying old ...
2011-08-17 15:59
who care about aztec!?! :S
2011-08-17 16:23
Valve should stick to it's winning recipe. And...what's that ? Well it's really simple. Counterstrike 1.6 gamers all over the world want 1.6 to evolve. How can a ten year old game evolve to something that we are all going to stick for another ten years ? Hmmm...not going to happen. You see we love games and especially those ones which make you think and use your brain in general. Even though 1.6 is a first person shooter requires you to create new strategies and defensive tactics to win the round/game. Until now, Counterstrike's evolution was the graphic experience. Source is a 5-6 year old graphic engine which looks really cool. By adding this engine to Counterstrike 1.6 you simply destroy it. And why's that ? We loved it just the way it is. Until now we play 1.6 cause we love competition. If graphics was the main point of its huge community, then 90% of the users would have quitted a lot of years ago. So, let's make it clear, we don't care about graphics. We want the game itself with some more additions like : - maps - weapon models - optimized wall,model,sky textures ..and such. OpenGL is a really old API which is impossible for Valve to stick around. Modern games become better & better (Battlefield 3, Crysis 2...) and Half Life 2 is surely a bad competitor. Kids nowadays pick their games based on their graphics. You buy your computer and first thing you look for is the graphics card. Graphics MATTER. I do the same. But NOT in Counterstrike 1.6. They should leave this game just the way it is. Take Quake for example. Quake 1 was amazing. Quake 2 was ok, Quake 3 Arena was somewhere in the middle and Quake 4 was just a...game. Anyway, we are not against Valve. But i am sure gamers will lead the way. CS 1.6 won't die and it's a GREAT game. I like it cause everytime i play i know this is my favourite game.
2011-08-17 16:34
3 replies
That's a lot of bold :P I agree with you on each and every point.
2011-08-17 17:48
1 reply
Haha yes :) ps : i read "blood" and not "bold" and i was like.... "eeehmmm?"
2011-08-17 18:03
I agree to an extent, but what do you think will happen a few years down the line. Do you really think that sponsors like Nvidia, Intel, Asus just to name a few will continue to support a 10 year old game on a 15 year old engine? Sooner or later the funds that contribute to this scene will diminish and all that will be left are some loyal gamers. Thats just my opinion though and I respect what you said, and I agree with most of it.
2011-08-18 02:22
#278
 | 
Brazil lullaby1
lol D:
2011-08-17 16:50
cool! ;*
2011-08-17 17:14
CS:GO CS 1.6?
2011-08-17 17:39
well i paid steam to play cs 1.6 so u cant update my game. we can choose what we like to play.
2011-08-17 18:10
Now we can all go on a Teco (Taser eco) and win. Hell, we can even play with a taser the whole game and still win. Can Valve seriously think about what they're doing?
2011-08-17 18:21
it will probably fail, but valve will still make a lot of money with it... sort of pisses me off...
2011-08-17 18:43
valve sucks ... where's train ?? Lol
2011-08-17 18:59
Do the fuck*** poll!
2011-08-17 19:01
I hope someday valve use brain and will make CS 1.6 with graphics of source (or better) with the same maps, weapons, game engine and the lovely scans <3 That will be great message for every counter-strike lovers (like me) :)) We must way, maybe the day will come Greetings for every1 who thinks the same way!
2011-08-17 19:11
1 reply
Updating Source currently, so we shall see if your CS1.6 with Source graphics appears :)
2011-08-18 02:15
What's next CS:GO? We now can drive the T Spawn truck and go outside bang the CT asses? LOL
2011-08-17 19:19
1 reply
+1
2011-08-17 20:41
WELCOME TO CALL OF DUTY! Decoy grenade ROFL!
2011-08-17 20:39
1 reply
yeah decoy was a disaster, true bro
2011-08-17 22:32
VALVE FAIL AGAIN AND AGAIN!! ¬¬
2011-08-17 20:42
They just fucked 1.6 in a hardcore way.
2011-08-17 21:22
Seriously guys, nobody will switch to this game, maybe some COD players, so who cares ? Let's play 1.6, let's enjoy the best esport FPS which is 1.6.
2011-08-17 21:52
They made a big mistake. I played 1.6, CSS, CoD1,2,4 (matches, not pub), I'm not a pro but I can tell you one thing - de_inferno 1.6 is the best map I have ever ever played in all these games. Changing topology will ruin the map that's for sure - same was with mp_harbor the best map in CoD1, not playable in CoD2.
2011-08-17 22:31
2 replies
this isnt for playability, this is for money, codmw2 had more bugs than zork in alpha(oh snap old school) and at the time was the biggest release of any game so really at this point kids want something that looks cool and if gameplay is shit as long as its easy for their slow minds to grasp is good
2011-08-17 22:51
1 reply
Yeah but you know Activision officially said that they don't fuckin care about multiplayer and so called "competitive play", they ended collaboration with IW guys and made a worst crap ever, not really caring about it. Here you have a bit different situation - these guys make a game clearly for MP and they even state that they want to collaborate with some players so that "1.6 guys will think about moving into GO".
2011-08-17 22:57
The only thing that Value should do is combine what CS:Online has and just make it cs 1.7.
2011-08-17 23:06
Right about now, id like to see what Gooseman could do with the source engine :)
2011-08-18 02:26
any screenshots of this maps?
2011-08-18 09:46
U are all so shit. Its pre Alpha omg
2011-08-18 14:13
Is true that new CS it will be featuring on consoles like XBOX and PlayStation? it would be awesome !
2011-08-18 21:01
i heard the t's can strap the c4 in their chest and change to suicide bomber mode !
2011-08-18 21:08
1 reply
LOL
2011-08-18 23:40
1.6 graphics or gtfo.
2011-08-19 01:25
1 reply
I love graphics but just look at how models move and guns shoot. absolutely awful. sad panda :((
2011-08-27 09:15
another fail game.. stupid Valve
2011-08-27 09:14
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.